Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ****LIVE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL 1/29/20 THREAD 7**** [View all]BumRushDaShow
(169,894 posts)56. Q. Previous answers was that accepting things of value was okay - based on propganda spread
by Russia on social media. Shouldn't we do everything we can with our intelligence agencies, to prevent foreign interference in our elections.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
111 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sheldon Whitehouse question to WH counsel demanding he answer the question about when
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#1
The Executive Branch is still trying to invalidate the Legislative process
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#2
So NOW the precident that the Pubs are saying staates the full house had to vote beefore a valid
napi21
Jan 2020
#3
Biden! Burisma! dogs sleeping with cats! will no one think of the squirrels!
Hermit-The-Prog
Jan 2020
#6
Q. (Hawley, Cruz, etc) - to House first. Biden question re: Shokin and ethics advice
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#8
Demmings responding - noting that it was documented that Shokin was a corrupt prosecutor
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#10
Q. Kaine to House Managers - Doesn't Drumpf's mention of Ghouliani's name establish the purpose
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#12
dream team: have Colludy Rudy testify, then trumPutin testify and compare
Hermit-The-Prog
Jan 2020
#13
Nadler response - established Ghouliani's key role in executing the pressure/smear campaigns
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#14
Q (Rubio, et al) -To Dershowitz - How can one remove a President if there is such a divide by party?
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#15
Q. Klobachar - Was on the impeachment trial for a judge - 26 witnesses were heard, 17 had not been
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#20
Schiff response-How is it possible that time of the Senate could be occupied for a judge impeachment
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#21
Schiff slamming DT's lawyers for using such an argument. Bet they're thrilled! n/t
napi21
Jan 2020
#22
Q, What is the diffrence between the impeachment of a judge and a President?
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#24
Q. (short) President claimed that it was "okay" to invite foreign involvement in the elections or
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#26
Q. (Loefler + other Rs) - As a fact witness handling the whistleblower, is that not a process issue?
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#33
Philbin back to the fabrication about the whistleblower and the Intelligence Committee
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#34
Lofgren - noting that during the impeachment, Ghouliani was still travelling to Ukraine
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#43
Q. Baraso (Risch, Pauly, Moran) Can the Senate convict a President for exercising his
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#45
Trump atty cites Turley and Derschowitz, saying the House charges themselves are unconstitutional
Miles Archer
Jan 2020
#49
"can the president be removed from office for exercising their constitutional powers"
Takket
Jan 2020
#48
Exactly, but the question was worded that way on purpose to allow for the BS argument. nt
crickets
Jan 2020
#55
How is ignoring the will of Congress by withholding approved aid to a foreign power
crickets
Jan 2020
#51
Q. Previous answers was that accepting things of value was okay - based on propganda spread
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#56
Schiff - "That's what they call policy but that is what I call corruption."
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#59
Q. Collins to House Managers - Articles asserted that the President committed bribery
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#63
Jeffries - responding. Summarizing the issue - pressuring of Ukraine for personal benefit
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#66
Q Gilibrand (Kasim Murphy, Rosen) - how was this different from other holds on foreign assistance
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#68
Crow noted that OMB staff in the regular chain in approvals had never had an appointee
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#70
Q. Blount (et al) - What do framers say about the threshhold for impeachment
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#71
Q. Murphy - The House has said they would abide by Chief Justice rulings on witnesses and docs
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#82
Q. Wicker to Dershowitz - What danger does this impeachment impose to our citizens?
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#85
threats, fear, don't do what is right because nut jobs are going to have a shit fit
Kali
Jan 2020
#87
Q. Sinema to WH counsel - if the admin notified Congress about holds in Afghanistan and Pakistan
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#91
Q. Young/Brown to House - was what was submitted overwhelming enough to have brought this to trial
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#96
Schiff responding - if the House followed what they are asking, then they would be told
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#98
Thank you all who had the stomach to stay with the threads and help contribute!!
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#106