Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The DNC had a choice: give Dolan a pulpit, or another nail in his self-made cross. [View all]msanthrope
(37,549 posts)27. Rewarding him would have been allowing him to claim, through his Fox News
and Repukes surrogates, that a 'muslin' President rejected the highest-ranking Catholic in America. Because we need a Rev. Wright/religious scandal, right?
No...Dolan got to speak to people leaving for the afterparty, and doesn't get to complain...and, he managed to piss off his own anti-choicers.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
120 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The DNC had a choice: give Dolan a pulpit, or another nail in his self-made cross. [View all]
msanthrope
Sep 2012
OP
Well, now we know Dolan will be quiet and stop his complaining about infringing on religious liberty
Fumesucker
Sep 2012
#1
Sure he can, they already are. Obama left the arena prior to the prayer they say, big insult
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2012
#83
not to mention the repeated, out loud, in your face freedom to marry and women take care
seabeyond
Sep 2012
#7
Yes, the paradox of the mighty Presidency and the "oh dear, we can't do THAT!"
Safetykitten
Sep 2012
#12
Yep--there are some things Obama cannot do if he wants reelection. Ask yourself something.....
msanthrope
Sep 2012
#18
No--he didn't get what he WANTED. What he WANTED was the ability to start a scandal and push the
msanthrope
Sep 2012
#23
Go read freeperville. They aren't pleased about Dolan at the DNC and the Al Smith Dinner, which
msanthrope
Sep 2012
#52
Why would I link from freeperville? The anti-gay rhetoric is offensive, and would
msanthrope
Sep 2012
#55
Um, no---the rightwing was pissed. The Daily Caller is rightwing. And take a look at the comments-
msanthrope
Sep 2012
#61
Then why so many people aggressively rationalizing, justifying and tolerating his attendance?
LanternWaste
Sep 2012
#104
Deval Patrick's speech about Democrats getting a backbone sounded good, but
bullwinkle428
Sep 2012
#13
There's getting a backbone, and there's avoiding the trap your enemy tried to lay for you.
msanthrope
Sep 2012
#17
There's also the courage of one's own conviction versus political expediency
LanternWaste
Sep 2012
#105
Dolan has been a thorn in the side of the administration. Rewarding him was stupid.
JVS
Sep 2012
#24
I live in Pennsylvania. No need to piss off the Catholic block here that want to
msanthrope
Sep 2012
#28
He wanted to claim that Obama took away his first amendment right because Obama hates Catholics.
JoePhilly
Sep 2012
#29
Yep....look what the 'muslin' President did to the highest-ranking Catholic in America. nt
msanthrope
Sep 2012
#31
The "Nuns on the Bus" got a much better time slot, and the Daily Caller was PISSED that Dolan
JoePhilly
Sep 2012
#43
Seems that our Catholic Vice President might have been able to address that a bit...
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2012
#98
And 'no thanks' would have given the repukes exactly the headlines they needed. As a woman, I'm
msanthrope
Sep 2012
#35
The networks all tuned to pundits and local news, the cable channels to pundits. The Nun on the Bus
msanthrope
Sep 2012
#64
"Thanks, but we already invited somebody else. We'll keep you in mind next time."
LeftyMom
Sep 2012
#33
How many supporting references to LGBTQ rights were made during this convention & by whom? nt
patrice
Sep 2012
#51
I think it would be easier to list speakers who didn't...but here's a video I thought was great:
msanthrope
Sep 2012
#60
Trust is a hard thing to cultivate. I am supporting a local liberal Catholic candidate; she will NOT
patrice
Sep 2012
#62
With honesty and respect, we can help one another, without agreeing on the more personal
patrice
Sep 2012
#70
Yep. Corrective responses are better than vindictive ones, because they give everyone more
patrice
Sep 2012
#76
There IS a tide and it will NOT be denied except by those who will not yeild to others what
patrice
Sep 2012
#68
I agree with your sentiment. I would never call myself a blind partisan. In fact, I'm really more
SlimJimmy
Sep 2012
#97
This was not a matter of civil rights to the President. In this case, it was a political
SlimJimmy
Sep 2012
#112
My father is. I haven't asked his opinion about this but I have some knowledge of the issues.
randome
Sep 2012
#86
He has not already lost his arguments. That's offensive and you should stop saying it.
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2012
#106
And I respect you, greatly. Let me be clear that I am not minimizing the utter disgust
msanthrope
Sep 2012
#116