Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
54. He already did---
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 01:01 PM
Sep 2012

These speak louder than an old man, praying to someone who isn't there:



Statement by the President on Certification of Repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell
Today, we have taken the final major step toward ending the discriminatory ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ law that undermines our military readiness and violates American principles of fairness and equality. In accordance with the legislation that I signed into law last December, I have certified and notified Congress that the requirements for repeal have been met. ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ will end, once and for all, in 60 days—on September 20, 2011.

As Commander in Chief, I have always been confident that our dedicated men and women in uniform would transition to a new policy in an orderly manner that preserves unit cohesion, recruitment, retention and military effectiveness. Today’s action follows extensive training of our military personnel and certification by Secretary Panetta and Admiral Mullen that our military is ready for repeal. As of September 20th, service members will no longer be forced to hide who they are in order to serve our country. Our military will no longer be deprived of the talents and skills of patriotic Americans just because they happen to be gay or lesbian.

I want to commend our civilian and military leadership for moving forward in the careful and deliberate manner that this change requires, especially with our nation at war. I want to thank all our men and women in uniform, including those who are gay or lesbian, for their professionalism and patriotism during this transition. Every American can be proud that our extraordinary troops and their families, like earlier generations that have adapted to other changes, will only grow stronger and remain the best fighting force in the world and a reflection of the values of justice and equality that the define us as Americans.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/07/22/statement-president-certification-repeal-dont-ask-dont-tell


Remarks of President Barack Obama on the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Restoration Act bill signing:

It is fitting that with the very first bill I sign – the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Restoration Act – we are upholding one of this nation’s first principles: that we are all created equal and each deserve a chance to pursue our own version of happiness.

It is also fitting that we are joined today by the woman after whom this bill is named – someone Michelle and I have had the privilege of getting to know for ourselves. Lilly Ledbetter didn’t set out to be a trailblazer or a household name. She was just a good hard worker who did her job – and did it well – for nearly two decades before discovering that for years, she was paid less than her male colleagues for the very same work. Over the course of her career, she lost more than $200,000 in salary, and even more in pension and Social Security benefits – losses she still feels today.

Now, Lilly could have accepted her lot and moved on. She could have decided that it wasn’t worth the hassle and harassment that would inevitably come with speaking up for what she deserved. But instead, she decided that there was a principle at stake, something worth fighting for. So she set out on a journey that would take more than ten years, take her all the way to the Supreme Court, and lead to this bill which will help others get the justice she was denied.

Because while this bill bears her name, Lilly knows this story isn’t just about her. It’s the story of women across this country still earning just 78 cents for every dollar men earn – women of color even less – which means that today, in the year 2009, countless women are still losing thousands of dollars in salary, income and retirement savings over the course of a lifetime.

But equal pay is by no means just a women’s issue – it’s a family issue. It’s about parents who find themselves with less money for tuition or child care; couples who wind up with less to retire on; households where, when one breadwinner is paid less than she deserves, that’s the difference between affording the mortgage – or not; between keeping the heat on, or paying the doctor’s bills – or not. And in this economy, when so many folks are already working harder for less and struggling to get by, the last thing they can afford is losing part of each month’s paycheck to simple discrimination.

So in signing this bill today, I intend to send a clear message: That making our economy work means making sure it works for everyone. That there are no second class citizens in our workplaces, and that it’s not just unfair and illegal – but bad for business – to pay someone less because of their gender, age, race, ethnicity, religion or disability. And that justice isn’t about some abstract legal theory, or footnote in a casebook – it’s about how our laws affect the daily realities of people’s lives: their ability to make a living and care for their families and achieve their goals.

Ultimately, though, equal pay isn’t just an economic issue for millions of Americans and their families, it’s a question of who we are – and whether we’re truly living up to our fundamental ideals. Whether we’ll do our part, as generations before us, to ensure those words put to paper more than 200 years ago really mean something – to breathe new life into them with the more enlightened understandings of our time.

That is what Lilly Ledbetter challenged us to do. And today, I sign this bill not just in her honor, but in honor of those who came before her. Women like my grandmother who worked in a bank all her life, and even after she hit that glass ceiling, kept getting up and giving her best every day, without complaint, because she wanted something better for me and my sister.

And I sign this bill for my daughters, and all those who will come after us, because I want them to grow up in a nation that values their contributions, where there are no limits to their dreams and they have opportunities their mothers and grandmothers never could have imagined.

In the end, that’s why Lilly stayed the course. She knew it was too late for her – that this bill wouldn’t undo the years of injustice she faced or restore the earnings she was denied. But this grandmother from Alabama kept on fighting, because she was thinking about the next generation. It’s what we’ve always done in America – set our sights high for ourselves, but even higher for our children and grandchildren.

Now it’s up to us to continue this work. This bill is an important step – a simple fix to ensure fundamental fairness to American workers – and I want to thank this remarkable and bi-partisan group of legislators who worked so hard to get it passed. And this is only the beginning. I know that if we stay focused, as Lilly did – and keep standing for what’s right, as Lilly did – we will close that pay gap and ensure that our daughters have the same rights, the same chances, and the same freedom to pursue their dreams as our sons.

Thank you.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/RemarksofPresidentBarackObamaontheLillyLedbetterFairPayRestorationActBillSigning/




FYI--jury--no copyright issue as these are public releases....




Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well, now we know Dolan will be quiet and stop his complaining about infringing on religious liberty Fumesucker Sep 2012 #1
He will also drop his lawsuit against the Obama administration jsr Sep 2012 #5
Of course he won't...but he took away a made-for-Fox News scandal msanthrope Sep 2012 #8
+1 hifiguy Sep 2012 #26
Polls have Obama up by 30 in NY Progressive dog Sep 2012 #45
NYC is the Ny Post, Fox News, Bill O'Lielly....no need to stir that pot. nt msanthrope Sep 2012 #58
DAYUM, msanthrope - that's a GREAT one! calimary Sep 2012 #93
I never forgot my Kubrick--see at 1:03. msanthrope Sep 2012 #118
Of course he won't...but now he can't complain Obama personalized msanthrope Sep 2012 #6
Sure he can, they already are. Obama left the arena prior to the prayer they say, big insult Bluenorthwest Sep 2012 #83
It took away an argument from the Repubs powergirl Sep 2012 #2
You are right--the anti-choicers were up in arms....nt msanthrope Sep 2012 #20
DU rec...nt SidDithers Sep 2012 #3
It was strange because we are a big tent party, this wasn't the RNC where JaneyVee Sep 2012 #4
not to mention the repeated, out loud, in your face freedom to marry and women take care seabeyond Sep 2012 #7
he can hang tough against world leaders but got strongarmed by a priest? piratefish08 Sep 2012 #9
Yes, the paradox of the mighty Presidency and the "oh dear, we can't do THAT!" Safetykitten Sep 2012 #12
Yep--there are some things Obama cannot do if he wants reelection. Ask yourself something..... msanthrope Sep 2012 #18
Very good points and totally lost on those who don't "get" politics. GoneOffShore Sep 2012 #42
You know what? We "get" politics Le Taz Hot Sep 2012 #74
You really think I would back slavery? nt msanthrope Sep 2012 #79
I don't know about "you," Le Taz Hot Sep 2012 #85
I've been around the same amount of time as you have. GoneOffShore Sep 2012 #91
There are certain things that cannot be Le Taz Hot Sep 2012 #94
In principle I agree. But we have to have control before that happens. GoneOffShore Sep 2012 #103
Speaking out for Civil Rights is "sputter." Le Taz Hot Sep 2012 #107
The DNC DID speak out for civil rights. randome Sep 2012 #109
I was referring to Le Taz Hot Sep 2012 #111
Got it. My misinterpretation. randome Sep 2012 #113
Oh, I'm just so hurt by that (sarcasm). GoneOffShore Sep 2012 #114
He didn't get strongarmed--he stepped over a steaming pile of shit. msanthrope Sep 2012 #15
And the DNC were the adults in the room, again. vanlassie Sep 2012 #10
C&P From My Response To You In Another Thread NCTraveler Sep 2012 #11
Dolan was a non-entity. He was neutralized. No one watched. msanthrope Sep 2012 #16
Neutralized? Really? NCTraveler Sep 2012 #22
No--he didn't get what he WANTED. What he WANTED was the ability to start a scandal and push the msanthrope Sep 2012 #23
He was welcomed into the lions den and spoke about life. NCTraveler Sep 2012 #49
Go read freeperville. They aren't pleased about Dolan at the DNC and the Al Smith Dinner, which msanthrope Sep 2012 #52
Post a link of them talking directly about Dolan and how upset they are. NCTraveler Sep 2012 #53
Why would I link from freeperville? The anti-gay rhetoric is offensive, and would msanthrope Sep 2012 #55
Your link goes completely against what you are saying. nt. NCTraveler Sep 2012 #59
Um, no---the rightwing was pissed. The Daily Caller is rightwing. And take a look at the comments- msanthrope Sep 2012 #61
Then why so many people aggressively rationalizing, justifying and tolerating his attendance? LanternWaste Sep 2012 #104
Deval Patrick's speech about Democrats getting a backbone sounded good, but bullwinkle428 Sep 2012 #13
There's getting a backbone, and there's avoiding the trap your enemy tried to lay for you. msanthrope Sep 2012 #17
Funny that you ask - living in a swing state and all, I have plans to bullwinkle428 Sep 2012 #67
There's also the courage of one's own conviction versus political expediency LanternWaste Sep 2012 #105
I wish we could do without the prayers treestar Sep 2012 #14
"Will no one rid me of this troublesome priest?" mysuzuki2 Sep 2012 #19
Careful. That one ended badly. Le Taz Hot Sep 2012 #75
Could it be because of the Al Smith Dinner? AngryOldDem Sep 2012 #21
Dolan has been a thorn in the side of the administration. Rewarding him was stupid. JVS Sep 2012 #24
Rewarding him would have been allowing him to claim, through his Fox News msanthrope Sep 2012 #27
Jesus Said DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2012 #25
I live in Pennsylvania. No need to piss off the Catholic block here that want to msanthrope Sep 2012 #28
I Used To Go To Catholic Church With My GF DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2012 #34
He wanted to claim that Obama took away his first amendment right because Obama hates Catholics. JoePhilly Sep 2012 #29
Yep....look what the 'muslin' President did to the highest-ranking Catholic in America. nt msanthrope Sep 2012 #31
The "Nuns on the Bus" got a much better time slot, and the Daily Caller was PISSED that Dolan JoePhilly Sep 2012 #43
Seems that our Catholic Vice President might have been able to address that a bit... Bluenorthwest Sep 2012 #98
"No Thanks" would have sufficed. liberalmuse Sep 2012 #30
And 'no thanks' would have given the repukes exactly the headlines they needed. As a woman, I'm msanthrope Sep 2012 #35
He's already lost that battle and everyone knows it. randome Sep 2012 #38
Dolan made an ass of himself. He was invited to make a prayer The Second Stone Sep 2012 #32
Personally, I like the fact that he made a public ass of himself. nt msanthrope Sep 2012 #37
Besides... Bobbie Jo Sep 2012 #63
The networks all tuned to pundits and local news, the cable channels to pundits. The Nun on the Bus msanthrope Sep 2012 #64
"Thanks, but we already invited somebody else. We'll keep you in mind next time." LeftyMom Sep 2012 #33
The laity doesn't own the right-wing media machine. nt msanthrope Sep 2012 #36
That would have been the easiest problem in the world to avoid. LeftyMom Sep 2012 #41
They look petty either way. randome Sep 2012 #44
"And we look gracious and above such nonsense." NCTraveler Sep 2012 #48
Except that eventually they will lose such prejudices. randome Sep 2012 #56
Alrighty then. Are_grits_groceries Sep 2012 #39
He already did--- msanthrope Sep 2012 #54
In all the outrage this is forgotten. GoneOffShore Sep 2012 #95
That was yesterday's news. Are_grits_groceries Sep 2012 #120
Pandering to the bigot vote is always a choice. The Link Sep 2012 #40
Fak u Dolan Erose999 Sep 2012 #46
You're doing a great job of rebutting the criticisms. GoneOffShore Sep 2012 #47
My preference, too. But not going to happen any convention soon..... msanthrope Sep 2012 #57
Thanks for explaining this. Whisp Sep 2012 #50
How many supporting references to LGBTQ rights were made during this convention & by whom? nt patrice Sep 2012 #51
I think it would be easier to list speakers who didn't...but here's a video I thought was great: msanthrope Sep 2012 #60
Trust is a hard thing to cultivate. I am supporting a local liberal Catholic candidate; she will NOT patrice Sep 2012 #62
We can be purists in a very small room (see, the Green Party) or we can msanthrope Sep 2012 #65
'Powerless' is exactly right. randome Sep 2012 #66
With honesty and respect, we can help one another, without agreeing on the more personal patrice Sep 2012 #70
And if things don't fit right... randome Sep 2012 #71
Yep. Corrective responses are better than vindictive ones, because they give everyone more patrice Sep 2012 #76
There IS a tide and it will NOT be denied except by those who will not yeild to others what patrice Sep 2012 #68
I honestly think they're giving him enough rope. nt LaydeeBug Sep 2012 #69
Why couldn't we have chosen Jack Sprat Sep 2012 #72
Oh, by all means, let's let the bigots Le Taz Hot Sep 2012 #73
Are you going to sit out the election or vote for Romney because of this? SlimJimmy Sep 2012 #77
Well, I've not sat out an election Le Taz Hot Sep 2012 #78
I agree with your sentiment. I would never call myself a blind partisan. In fact, I'm really more SlimJimmy Sep 2012 #97
And I don't think civil rights Le Taz Hot Sep 2012 #100
This was not a matter of civil rights to the President. In this case, it was a political SlimJimmy Sep 2012 #112
How are they controlling the narrative? randome Sep 2012 #81
They lost? And everyone knows it? William769 Sep 2012 #87
The momentum is unstoppable. randome Sep 2012 #88
If they "lost" Le Taz Hot Sep 2012 #89
Keep your friends close by, your enemies closer. randome Sep 2012 #90
Oh, hockey puck. Le Taz Hot Sep 2012 #96
I don't think it needs to be N-dimension chess. randome Sep 2012 #99
Sorry, the cost was too high. Le Taz Hot Sep 2012 #101
I guess you'd have to take a poll to know that. randome Sep 2012 #108
I have the utmost respect for you but on this you are wrong. William769 Sep 2012 #80
No one was pushed to the back at the DNC I watched. randome Sep 2012 #82
Are you part of the LGBT community? William769 Sep 2012 #84
My father is. I haven't asked his opinion about this but I have some knowledge of the issues. randome Sep 2012 #86
He has not already lost his arguments. That's offensive and you should stop saying it. Bluenorthwest Sep 2012 #106
My point has been that the momentum cannot be stopped. randome Sep 2012 #110
And I respect you, greatly. Let me be clear that I am not minimizing the utter disgust msanthrope Sep 2012 #116
They caved to Dolan, God, and the Israel lobby. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2012 #92
What little I heard was about social and economic justice Warpy Sep 2012 #102
Let him scream. His screaming about contraception backfired... WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2012 #115
There is nothing that DU will not defend SomethingFishy Sep 2012 #117
I suppose you're right ... GeorgeGist Sep 2012 #119
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The DNC had a choice: giv...»Reply #54