Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progree

(12,860 posts)
20. The presidential jobs table
Sun Feb 9, 2020, 02:23 PM
Feb 2020

# Job Creation of record of post-WWII Presidents, Average Annual % Increases. -- Sorted from best to worst by average annual percentage increase in jobs. Republicans in red, Democrats in blue. Notice that -- with the tiny exception (0.02% difference) of Nixon to Kennedy -- the worst Democrat has a better record than the best Republican -- that is, until Obama, who inherited an economy that was losing several hundred thousand jobs a month.

Also, Kennedy did not have a chance to complete his term -- had he done so, and had he had the same job creation numbers in December 1963 through January 1965 as Johnson had (a 3.48%/year annualized rate of increase), he would have easily topped Nixon.

(updated 2/7/20 after new jobs report released - it has revisions going back decades. Unfortunately, Ford edges out Obama on average annual percentage job increase by 0.01% (1.09% to 1.08%)




Remember, Obama inherited the deepest recession since World War II, which lost 4.2 million jobs in the last 10 months of his predecessor, and in the last 3 months of his predecessor was losing 753,000 jobs a month. With that momentum, job losses continued for the first 13 months of the Obama presidency -- through February 2010 -- totalling 4.3 million jobs lost during those 13 months.

Anyway, despite the 4.3 million jobs lost in his first 13 months because of the Bush crash, Obama still beats 3 of the last 6 post-WWII Republican presidents with completed terms.

In the above table, the average annual % increase in jobs (the last column) is a much fairer way to compare presidents than just the raw job creation figures in thousands because the latter is unfair to the earlier presidents who were working with much smaller labor forces to begin with. For example the number of job holders at the beginning of Truman's administration was only 38% as many as at the beginning of Clinton's administration, and 31% as many as at the beginning of G.W. Bush's administration. So Truman's pathetic-looking 93,570 jobs/month creation record turns out to be even better than Clinton's 238,521 jobs/month record when adjusted for the size of the labor force at the beginning of their terms.

In raw thousands of jobs created per year, both Reagan and Nixon beat Truman. But when adjusted for the size of the labor force -- again, by looking at average annual percentage increases in jobs -- Truman beats them both.

Official sources of information for the above:

# Payroll Jobs: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001
# Monthly change of above: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001?output_view=net_1mth
# . . Hint: to see both of the above two together on the same page, go to http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001 and click on the "More Formatting Options" link in the upper right and check the "Original Data Value" and the "1-Month Net Change" checkboxes and click the "Retrieve Data" button halfway down the page on the left
# Private Sector Payroll Employment: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000001
# Monthly change of above: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000001?output_view=net_1mth

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I know.... cilla4progress Feb 2020 #1
Why we were saying it then? fescuerescue Feb 2020 #16
Yep! cilla4progress Feb 2020 #17
I agree 100% mylightningtoo Feb 2020 #2
Meanwhile the real Trump Economy BlueIdaho Feb 2020 #3
Totally! cilla4progress Feb 2020 #19
Yep ck4829 Feb 2020 #24
Thank you! thegoose Feb 2020 #4
Correct, only dump & the 1% CountAllVotes Feb 2020 #7
Agreed . . . Iliyah Feb 2020 #5
Imagine the economy if money was no object under Obama. That's what they should brewens Feb 2020 #6
The problem is ... most people are invested in real estate ... mr_lebowski Feb 2020 #8
Yes,if you are planning on Wellstone ruled Feb 2020 #9
I am in the midst of house hunting handmade34 Feb 2020 #10
Good Luck DanieRains Feb 2020 #11
Caveat Emptor... handmade34 Feb 2020 #12
and buy title insurance...it does protect you just in case, and it's only a one time fee! SWBTATTReg Feb 2020 #22
Hire a home evaluator, do thorough checks on the person or company that you hire. Blue_true Feb 2020 #13
Remember how resistant the media was to giving President Obama ecstatic Feb 2020 #14
It's quite shocking ck4829 Feb 2020 #25
Real weekly earnings... Obama last 3y: +4.48%, Trump's first 35 mo: +2.84%, Last 12 mo: +0.31% progree Feb 2020 #15
thank you nt spooky3 Feb 2020 #28
Deficits falling (under Obama) and rising (under Trump) progree Feb 2020 #18
Impressive data collection and cilla4progress Feb 2020 #21
The presidential jobs table progree Feb 2020 #20
Work in retail, feel what 'borrowed time' is like ck4829 Feb 2020 #23
to me Skittles Feb 2020 #26
And with this "retail apocalypse" going on, the squeeze is on ck4829 Feb 2020 #29
OMG Skittles Feb 2020 #30
Ugh. True. Dems need to turn his supposed strength into his obvious weakness. n/t Beartracks Feb 2020 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Our Economy Is Not Doing ...»Reply #20