Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(84,920 posts)
6. No, and I know where you're going with this
Mon Feb 10, 2020, 04:43 AM
Feb 2020

We all know the general election rules under the Constitution and we'll never fully know the extent to which the Russians, Comey letter, Wikileaks and Jill Stein contributed to the loss. Thus, we have no legal basis to overturn the 2016 election. All we can do going forward is abolish the electoral for general election and caucuses (which the Sanders campaign ABSOLUTELY LOVED in 2016) for the nominating process.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

You are cute. I can appreciate this. Lol. krissey Feb 2020 #1
. Tiggeroshii Feb 2020 #2
By whom? The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2020 #3
The candidates know the rules for both the primary and general election. TexasTowelie Feb 2020 #4
The Sanders campaign LOVED caucuses in 2016. RandySF Feb 2020 #7
Because Sanders would lose. TwilightZone Feb 2020 #11
Of course. A healthy democracy shouldn't function any other way. jcmaine72 Feb 2020 #5
No, and I know where you're going with this RandySF Feb 2020 #6
No we need an amendment to change the rules Midnightwalk Feb 2020 #8
Nope. TwilightZone Feb 2020 #9
Changing the Constitution is not done by poll. alphafemale Feb 2020 #10
How would you accomplish this stated goal? Sherman A1 Feb 2020 #12
Everyone who's posted so far was so serious. CaptYossarian Feb 2020 #13
Yes, the United Nations let us down again. TheCowsCameHome Feb 2020 #14
No, but no one here ever hesitates to proclaim that Clinton won the PV by 3 million Tom Rinaldo Feb 2020 #15
I would word the question differently: DFW Feb 2020 #16
It wasn't a general election so it isn't really the same gollygee Feb 2020 #17
Exactly democrattotheend Feb 2020 #23
No, because there was no provision in the rules to do so Blue_Tires Feb 2020 #18
Have some Slipknot ismnotwasm Feb 2020 #19
Sure, why not? Shrek Feb 2020 #20
What is this supposed to mean? The winner of our hearts? lol tritsofme Feb 2020 #21
Yes and no democrattotheend Feb 2020 #22
Locking. JudyM Feb 2020 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should HRC have been decl...»Reply #6