Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(54,010 posts)
69. +100000000
Tue Feb 11, 2020, 05:12 PM
Feb 2020

I should know, having been born in the US, growing up in London, living a few years back in the US, and now living in Sweden.

The people who want to run out AOC and most likely all left progressives from our Party if possible would, if they were somehow magically successful, end up destroying our Party, as if the left were completely or near completely frozen out, the Party would have to lurch to the right in order to make up for the left voters who would leave at that point, stop coting D, and quite possibly form a third party. That lurch to the centre right would only exacerbate the haemorrhaging from the left base. The Rethugs would sit back, laugh, and dominate electorally. Thus are the flaws of the American non-proportional representation FPTP single member district, majoritarian form of electoral system.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If we don't have a democratic incumbent in 2024 the country will be gone. n/t rzemanfl Feb 2020 #1
I might have jumped the gun in stating 2024. I'm hoping for 2028. Gravitycollapse Feb 2020 #7
she is old enough by 99 days to run in 2024 nt Celerity Feb 2020 #21
It's AOC. An incumbent will be no barrier. kcr Feb 2020 #55
AOC is still smarter than 99% of the men in DC and... JoeOtterbein Feb 2020 #2
75% of all stats are made up SlogginThroughIt Feb 2020 #22
So you're in DC, huh? LanternWaste Feb 2020 #47
Cool story bro awesomerwb1 Feb 2020 #58
It hardly matters now. maxsolomon Feb 2020 #3
no... not in a million years lapfog_1 Feb 2020 #4
She will be 35 before the election (requirement is 35). Gravitycollapse Feb 2020 #5
Post removed Post removed Feb 2020 #6
What a distasteful thing to say about a bright and beautiful young champion of human & civil rights Alex4Martinez Feb 2020 #8
+1 Gravitycollapse Feb 2020 #9
I went to look at profile and poof! the post was gone. n/t rzemanfl Feb 2020 #12
Did Archie Bunker tell you to say that? SharonClark Feb 2020 #10
She's so young that any opening that comes up will show she is a viable candidate. Tiggeroshii Feb 2020 #11
The Democratic Party demographic has been trending in that direction Quixote1818 Feb 2020 #13
Only if Trump wins yet again fescuerescue Feb 2020 #14
I should clarify, I got ahead of myself. This would be assuming Trump wins again. Gravitycollapse Feb 2020 #15
yea no worries fescuerescue Feb 2020 #16
I hope not. wisteria Feb 2020 #17
Oh good grief. Of course not. nt Codeine Feb 2020 #18
Yup, 2040 maybe. She is too progressive for the electorate of today Amishman Feb 2020 #80
There are a lot of uncertainties for her. For one, NY is likely to lose 2 House seats before 2022 tritsofme Feb 2020 #19
I hope she's President someday. TroubleMan Feb 2020 #20
POTUS is about the last thing I think of whenever I think of AOC Zolorp Feb 2020 #23
Why? Gravitycollapse Feb 2020 #24
She's a disaster. Zolorp Feb 2020 #25
How is she a disaster? Gravitycollapse Feb 2020 #26
Way too radical. Zolorp Feb 2020 #27
She has a majority approval rating amongst her constituency. Good luck with that. Gravitycollapse Feb 2020 #29
Any money spent trying to defeat her in a primary is well spent Zolorp Feb 2020 #51
"Way too radical" John Fante Feb 2020 #46
God thing we aren't Western Europe. Zolorp Feb 2020 #48
Yeah, who needs universal healthcare, low-cost/free college, and a high QOL? John Fante Feb 2020 #54
+100000000 Celerity Feb 2020 #69
The Germans would probably go for all that--IF they could have it DFW Feb 2020 #70
Public universities in Germany are tuition-free for undergraduate students. Yes or no? John Fante Feb 2020 #75
Not for everyone DFW Feb 2020 #94
That's a whole lot of unsupported allegations in only three sentences. LanternWaste Feb 2020 #49
You spelled *opinion* wrong Zolorp Feb 2020 #52
Same here PatSeg Feb 2020 #68
No. TexasTowelie Feb 2020 #28
What administrative experience does she have? brooklynite Feb 2020 #30
What administrative experience did Obama have? Gravitycollapse Feb 2020 #31
At a minimum, 10 years of running his legislative offices. brooklynite Feb 2020 #34
He had 4 years experience as a US congress person. She will have more. Gravitycollapse Feb 2020 #37
You're comparing her to President Obama... padah513 Feb 2020 #60
Obama had worked in the Skidmore Feb 2020 #85
Bartender still_one Feb 2020 #78
Regardless of her actual age and regardless of the fairness of the perception, RockRaven Feb 2020 #32
Hell yeah jr1118x Feb 2020 #33
LOL Zeus69 Feb 2020 #35
She will be a strong contender... in 2028. John Fante Feb 2020 #36
Only if she runs against a really crazy Republican (even by their standards) Polybius Feb 2020 #67
She's a lightweight Horizens Feb 2020 #38
A lightweight jr1118x Feb 2020 #39
"lightweight" jcgoldie Feb 2020 #42
lightweight Horizens Feb 2020 #44
getting national attention is a hell of an accomplishment for a first term representative unblock Feb 2020 #53
There's a difference between being known and being accomplished Horizens Feb 2020 #65
True, but her job is to do right by her district unblock Feb 2020 #76
Known? Maybe because Trump uses her as a symbol. dem4decades Feb 2020 #77
he didn't pluck her out of obscurity. unblock Feb 2020 #86
Thorn in his side? Trump needs 3 states, does she hurt him in those? dem4decades Feb 2020 #87
Are her constituents suffering because of any of this? unblock Feb 2020 #88
If she helps Trump win those three states? Yes they'r suffering dem4decades Feb 2020 #89
Alrighty then. I guess liberal ny districts should elect centrists reps unblock Feb 2020 #93
No, she is only popular with the most Progressive Dems, and thanks to plenty of smears Takket Feb 2020 #40
I have a hard time getting excited about ... nini Feb 2020 #41
As much as AOC's critiques of the Democratic Party annoy me, this John Fante Feb 2020 #50
ok let me rephrase nini Feb 2020 #73
She has a long way to go before she could put together a coalition like that. nt UniteFightBack Feb 2020 #43
Hopefully not Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2020 #45
You're joking, right? Recursion Feb 2020 #56
really? don't think so beachbumbob Feb 2020 #57
IMO? Not yet. Happy Hoosier Feb 2020 #59
She is as popular as the flu around here. nt doc03 Feb 2020 #61
I like her a lot ibegurpard Feb 2020 #62
She is unelectable nationally Renew Deal Feb 2020 #63
Nope! LiberalFighter Feb 2020 #64
She's be barely legal constitutionally Polybius Feb 2020 #66
The math made my head and heart hurt too. Pacifist Patriot Feb 2020 #72
Maybe much further down the road. Maybe. Pacifist Patriot Feb 2020 #71
Is she going to work/train to be president? PAMod Feb 2020 #74
There are MANY other more mature women who would be serious contenders. For example, pnwmom Feb 2020 #79
i'd give it more time than 2024. if the public wind of the democratic party blows just right, sure. Kurt V. Feb 2020 #81
WITHOUT A DOUBT... AOC WILL BE THE NEXT POTUS AFTER PRESIDENT SANDERS!! InAbLuEsTaTe Feb 2020 #82
She needs more seasoning, and exposure... MountCleaners Feb 2020 #83
She'll be lucky to keep her seat. brush Feb 2020 #84
Nope In It to Win It Feb 2020 #90
No. H2O Man Feb 2020 #91
She would be 35 before taking office. Gravitycollapse Feb 2020 #92
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Watching AOC right now. I...»Reply #69