Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newest Reality

(12,712 posts)
8. Interesting to know.
Mon Feb 17, 2020, 02:18 PM
Feb 2020

Thanks. I try to stay abreast of this stuff, but its not hard when you look at the screen on the register and your eyes bug out on the increase.

I am on a fixed amount for food, so I have become very sensitive to it because, instead of snarling at the inconvenience of paying more, I am forced to keep eating less. That's another problem with exorbitant food prices and steady and large increases, it has a major impact on low-income people and that leads to extreme malnutrition.

Of course, SNAP should be adjusted for the increases, but it isn't and hasn't been. For instance, over several years now, there was only a $2.00-per-month increase just recently, (my average food budget is $6.00-per-day and that "increase" added about $.06-cents-per-day. The initiatives to get people off of it and make eligibility more difficult are a distraction and are going in a dangerous direction, especially with the kind of increases coming that you mentioned. When it comes down to extreme hunger for adults, children and seniors, (in an insanely wealthy country) we don't know how and when that will boil over and/or impact our society in major ways.

Considering that you have recipients with little or no income who depend on it and also scores of working poor who barely get by on the "supplemental" aspect of it, a crises is looming. What makes it easier to play with is the terminology, methinks. Both the terms supplemental and assistance changed the ball game and they mean that they are only supplementing what you already have or get.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

While everyone was not paying attention. Wellstone ruled Feb 2020 #1
Yes... Newest Reality Feb 2020 #5
When the Store Manager and Produce Wellstone ruled Feb 2020 #7
Interesting to know. Newest Reality Feb 2020 #8
Good comments,thanks. Wellstone ruled Feb 2020 #10
Yes. Newest Reality Feb 2020 #11
As my Grand Parents mentioned Wellstone ruled Feb 2020 #14
That's another good point. Newest Reality Feb 2020 #15
K&R smirkymonkey Feb 2020 #2
And... Newest Reality Feb 2020 #3
Trump got a .02 while Obama got a 1.5 growth. krissey Feb 2020 #4
I always say the economy's doing well in spite of Trump, not because of him. Dennis Donovan Feb 2020 #6
+1 Newest Reality Feb 2020 #9
Throw out the stats, just be pleasant, and agree with the people who say it's the best economy ever ck4829 Feb 2020 #12
Artificially propped up by massive infusions from the Fed. MerryBlooms Feb 2020 #13
i knew it had to be BS. i did way better under clinton. pansypoo53219 Feb 2020 #16
"You'll have lots more money for groceries if you don't pay your electric bills!:" struggle4progress Feb 2020 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Best economy ever? Not re...»Reply #8