Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cos dem

(942 posts)
8. Basically, yes.
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 01:42 PM
Mar 2020

However, keep in mind these are pretty simple math models, and don't account for the inevitable feedback mechanism of human behavior. This is both good and bad. The bad part is people looking at today's data, not understanding exponential growth, and thinking things will be fine. The good part is those starting to take it seriously, with cancellation of sports, concerts, school, etc. All of this plays into a much more complicated outcome, with potentially fewer cases overall.

The one thing that can be said for sure, is that if the "flattened curve" avoids exceeding the medical capacity of our hospitals, that fewer deaths will result, because the serious cases will be able to be dealt with, rather being triaged and rationed the way they are in Italy right now.

For other math nerds:
My main area of expertise is signal processing, and I find it very interesting how the "flattened curve" resembles the impulse response of a bandlimiting filter. The energy in the impulse remains the same, but the response is stretched in time, and also delayed by the group delay of the filter.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It can accomplish both lower peak demand and fewer infections PSPS Mar 2020 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author bearsfootball516 Mar 2020 #2
Yes, but it keeps the peak lower. RichardRay Mar 2020 #3
The point of flattening the curve Salviati Mar 2020 #4
The concept of flattening the curve is to reduce the rate but not the overall number... Girard442 Mar 2020 #5
Pretty close--and that's a very good thing. AleksS Mar 2020 #6
Here's a way to think about it... CincyDem Mar 2020 #7
Nice analogy! cos dem Mar 2020 #11
Haha. Yeah. Once you try the gallon challenge... CincyDem Mar 2020 #19
Why does this put me in mind of colonoscopy prep? misanthrope Mar 2020 #22
Having done both, trust me...the colonoscopy prep is much easier. Lol. n/t CincyDem Mar 2020 #24
Basically, yes. cos dem Mar 2020 #8
Yes. That's the point. jberryhill Mar 2020 #9
To address an underlying point we don't have unfettered testing so we don't know how long... uponit7771 Mar 2020 #10
this is a pretty comprehensive explaination Takket Mar 2020 #12
Was able to tease a simulation off their site BumRushDaShow Mar 2020 #16
Thank you Botany Mar 2020 #17
If the curve flattens out enough, we make get a vaccine before some people get sick. Jim__ Mar 2020 #13
Not to compare COVID-19 to the Flu... Windy City Charlie Mar 2020 #14
And as an aside, Igel Mar 2020 #23
One helpful side effect may also be reducing the number of cases and fatalities Ms. Toad Mar 2020 #15
Yes, but... Drahthaardogs Mar 2020 #18
Yes. Flattening the curve is about preventing deaths, not total cases, over time. RockRaven Mar 2020 #20
Just spitballing.... Brainfodder Mar 2020 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Flattening the Curve ques...»Reply #8