Post removed

[Tommy_Carcetti]

35. This is like a lazy cut and paste of Juanita Broaddrick's allegations against Clinton...

...which I found equally non-credible.

Unsworn allegations ranging decades back, accuser acted uncharacteristically affable towards the accused at the time (Reade praised Biden for years; Broaddrick actually attended a fundraiser for Clinton a couple of weeks after the date she later claimed he assaulted her.)

Both later brought supposed corroborating witnesses long after the fact (Broaddrick’s ‘witnesses’ include her subsequent husband and a pair of sisters who had a personal gripe against Clinton for commuting the sentence of their father’s killer.)

The “witnesses” never actually claim to have witnessed the alleged assault but rather claim that the accuser told them after the fact.

Just like the “accusers”, the witnesses won’t go under oath either.

Notably, while people want to “what about” this with Christine Blasey Ford, who accused Brett Kavanaugh of assault, Ford actually went under oath with her allegations, unlike either Broaddrick or Reade.

This is lazy bullshit.