Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)9. Biden doesn't have to get down in the mud, that's for his lawyers to do. (nt)
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Totally agree. Biden needs to fight this head on, and needs to expose the information
BComplex
Apr 2020
#13
This. Biden has already addressed her accusations publicly. He need do no more.
crickets
Apr 2020
#5
Biden doesn't have to get down in the mud, that's for his lawyers to do. (nt)
scarletwoman
Apr 2020
#9
Thanks - that's the way I feel about it. I don't want to see Biden swiftboated.
scarletwoman
Apr 2020
#42
"He's going to have to prove her story wrong..." That's why I think he needs to take her to court.
scarletwoman
Apr 2020
#12
The best defense is a good offense. She has no proof, & there's a lot of evidence to support Biden.
scarletwoman
Apr 2020
#30
There is no way to prove her story wrong. She is obviously changing it and is unreliable ...she
Demsrule86
Apr 2020
#22
Discovery in that lawsuit would be the end of it. The evidence against her claim is
BComplex
Apr 2020
#14
Maybe so. But ignoring it isn't going to work - look what happened to John Kerry. (nt)
scarletwoman
Apr 2020
#11
Of course he is innocent...that is not the point...your idea is a bad one. We are a few months away
Demsrule86
Apr 2020
#29
"...sometimes you have to go above to clear things even when it's bull." Thank you, I appreciate
scarletwoman
Apr 2020
#39
That is what they want...very bad idea....and people on our side are doing no such thing...these are
Demsrule86
Apr 2020
#46
Just to be clear NO AND NO. That would give her story false credibility. Deny it...make her
Demsrule86
Apr 2020
#48
"She can't withstand scrutiny." That's why I thought a defamation suit would be the way to do that.
scarletwoman
Apr 2020
#56
He should also give the University of Delaware permission to release her personnel file
democrattotheend
Apr 2020
#71
Problem is they are going to keep them coming. New one. She can't remember the year.
emmaverybo
Apr 2020
#37
This Tweet thread reveals claim since removed from the web page referring to and the deleted tweet:
emmaverybo
May 2020
#83
One thing is clear, Al Franken didn't file a defamation suit, and everything worked out for him.
rgbecker
Apr 2020
#43
I just want to make sure she is thoroughly discredited publicly and in no uncertain terms.
scarletwoman
Apr 2020
#54
Oh, I'm sure there is a "control" behind her. And it would be great to expose whoever it/they may be
scarletwoman
Apr 2020
#65
Thanks much! This, along with all the evidence in CousinIT's OP that I linked in my OP is why I wish
scarletwoman
Apr 2020
#60
Ding ding ding! The only correct answer in this thread, in my opinion. Here's why:
Mister Ed
Apr 2020
#78
Thank you. I am certainly willing to concede that a lawsuit might not be the best idea.
scarletwoman
Apr 2020
#61