Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)11. Maybe so. But ignoring it isn't going to work - look what happened to John Kerry. (nt)
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Totally agree. Biden needs to fight this head on, and needs to expose the information
BComplex
Apr 2020
#13
This. Biden has already addressed her accusations publicly. He need do no more.
crickets
Apr 2020
#5
Biden doesn't have to get down in the mud, that's for his lawyers to do. (nt)
scarletwoman
Apr 2020
#9
Thanks - that's the way I feel about it. I don't want to see Biden swiftboated.
scarletwoman
Apr 2020
#42
"He's going to have to prove her story wrong..." That's why I think he needs to take her to court.
scarletwoman
Apr 2020
#12
The best defense is a good offense. She has no proof, & there's a lot of evidence to support Biden.
scarletwoman
Apr 2020
#30
There is no way to prove her story wrong. She is obviously changing it and is unreliable ...she
Demsrule86
Apr 2020
#22
Discovery in that lawsuit would be the end of it. The evidence against her claim is
BComplex
Apr 2020
#14
Maybe so. But ignoring it isn't going to work - look what happened to John Kerry. (nt)
scarletwoman
Apr 2020
#11
Of course he is innocent...that is not the point...your idea is a bad one. We are a few months away
Demsrule86
Apr 2020
#29
"...sometimes you have to go above to clear things even when it's bull." Thank you, I appreciate
scarletwoman
Apr 2020
#39
That is what they want...very bad idea....and people on our side are doing no such thing...these are
Demsrule86
Apr 2020
#46
Just to be clear NO AND NO. That would give her story false credibility. Deny it...make her
Demsrule86
Apr 2020
#48
"She can't withstand scrutiny." That's why I thought a defamation suit would be the way to do that.
scarletwoman
Apr 2020
#56
He should also give the University of Delaware permission to release her personnel file
democrattotheend
Apr 2020
#71
Problem is they are going to keep them coming. New one. She can't remember the year.
emmaverybo
Apr 2020
#37
This Tweet thread reveals claim since removed from the web page referring to and the deleted tweet:
emmaverybo
May 2020
#83
One thing is clear, Al Franken didn't file a defamation suit, and everything worked out for him.
rgbecker
Apr 2020
#43
I just want to make sure she is thoroughly discredited publicly and in no uncertain terms.
scarletwoman
Apr 2020
#54
Oh, I'm sure there is a "control" behind her. And it would be great to expose whoever it/they may be
scarletwoman
Apr 2020
#65
Thanks much! This, along with all the evidence in CousinIT's OP that I linked in my OP is why I wish
scarletwoman
Apr 2020
#60
Ding ding ding! The only correct answer in this thread, in my opinion. Here's why:
Mister Ed
Apr 2020
#78
Thank you. I am certainly willing to concede that a lawsuit might not be the best idea.
scarletwoman
Apr 2020
#61