Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Solomon

(12,641 posts)
30. The hearing will show that their motion has no basis in fact and law and so the conviction should
Fri May 8, 2020, 01:14 PM
May 2020

stand. The judge should sentence him and Flynn can then file whatever appeal he thinks he has but hopefully he will sit in jail pending appeal.

I spent 20 years practicing before Judge Sullivan and Judge Walton and I can tell you, they don't go for bullshitting. They take their work very seriously.

If he doesn't hold a hearing then people will just keep spouting the lies that are in their motion in support of exonerating Flynn.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

He's very independent; he was previously not able to hide his disgust for Flynn's crimes and he has hlthe2b May 2020 #1
In a flynn sentencing hearing, the word TREASON came up. [Not argued] empedocles May 2020 #4
What do you mean by "epidemic" word? kentuck May 2020 #5
Imho, 'treason', is unpredictably/epidemically powerful. In most of 1941 voters were empedocles May 2020 #17
And which judge is it.......... MyOwnPeace May 2020 #2
That was Judge Reggie Walton. I know both judges personally and they are old school. Solomon May 2020 #9
Thank you! MyOwnPeace May 2020 #19
Judge Sullivan told Flynn that he had betrayed his country, so unless they threaten him tblue37 May 2020 #3
trump seems to have been wary on the pardon power empedocles May 2020 #6
IF I were the judge I would kacekwl May 2020 #7
Meaningless to speculate! Barbara McCuaig said. on Rachel last night the judge "most likely Ninga May 2020 #8
I disagree with your sentiment. If the judge wants to stick with Solomon May 2020 #10
You know this how? It is the DOJ's case, it does not belong to the judge. If they want to withdraw Ninga May 2020 #11
How does it not belong to the Judge? kentuck May 2020 #12
Ok, explain to me what happens to the case when charges are dropped? The case belongs to the Ninga May 2020 #13
Not from what I have read, PRETZEL May 2020 #15
You are correct. The case is on the last page of the final chapter. LastDemocratInSC May 2020 #18
Yes. He has already been convicted but not yet sentenced. Solomon May 2020 #27
Nah, those rw fascist Russian Repugs at SCOTUS will definitely take the case and exonerate drumpf. lark May 2020 #14
welp, i dunno. but mopinko May 2020 #16
I love my DU peeps. But. I asked a lawyer friend what recourse Judge has, she said none. Ninga May 2020 #20
Is the Judge part of the Executive Branch or the Judicial Branch. kentuck May 2020 #21
I don't know. I guess we will find out. Ninga May 2020 #22
The courts are the third supposedly co-equal branch of our government. They don't work for the Solomon May 2020 #28
The DOJ has *requested* dismissal. The motion has not been ruled on. sl8 May 2020 #23
Thank you. I read the first link and found it helpful to understanding. Unfortunately, see Ninga May 2020 #24
Jeez. He has already been convicted! What about that that people do not understand! Solomon May 2020 #29
With respects Glenn Kirscher a lawyer who has appeared before the judge in court GusBob May 2020 #25
Of course he will, but a hearing produces what? Please see the link. Ninga May 2020 #26
The hearing will show that their motion has no basis in fact and law and so the conviction should Solomon May 2020 #30
Ok then. I trust your experience. Thanks. Ninga May 2020 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What do we know about thi...»Reply #30