Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(11,222 posts)

4. They were incorrectly arguing tear gas is CS. What was used couldn't be teargas because it wasn't CS

Thu Jun 4, 2020, 04:00 PM

Jun 2020

Yes. Teargas is a general term. Finding the canister alone shows without a doubt A teargas was used. Regardless. As far as I see it. Am I wrong?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump Said No Tear Gas Used to Clear Protesters for Photo Op. These Canisters Suggest Otherwise. [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2020 OP

Not Sure About That ProfessorGAC Jun 2020 #3

They Were ProfessorGAC Jun 2020 #8

Thanks. Pretty much as I've read without the chemical names. Hortensis Jun 2020 #5

Trump's lying again? It will be news if he ever tells the truth. Jim__ Jun 2020 #2

BLOTUS is a LIAR.. Everything he's spews is a BIG FAT LIE. Cha Jun 2020 #6

People on twitter trying to claim OC canisters aren't really tear gas crickets Jun 2020 #7