Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

zak247

(251 posts)
10. From the deep state for trump
Mon Jun 8, 2020, 08:22 PM
Jun 2020

Came this obvious dog of an idea.

Some Trump supporters or super Susan Sarandon types who want to take us to hell started this lame idea

The hell with that stupid jack-assess who want to hand another gift to Trump.

How stupid can you be!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I totally agree! redstatebluegirl Jun 2020 #1
I get what it says? pwb Jun 2020 #2
Sadly too late, elleng Jun 2020 #3
Policing for the people. Doodley Jun 2020 #4
I like that pattyloutwo Jun 2020 #37
Agree! mzmolly Jun 2020 #5
It's funny though that Republicans would have a problem, they talk about defunding Doodley Jun 2020 #6
and you've just illustrated why it's a really crappy idea stopdiggin Jun 2020 #42
Sounds like the framing is working. People are talking about what it means. aikoaiko Jun 2020 #7
There is controlling the narrative, and then there is conceding the narrative which what this is. Thomas Hurt Jun 2020 #8
I agree with you, but UncleTomsEvilBrother Jun 2020 #9
Its easy: REFORM THE POLICE zak247 Jun 2020 #14
I like Reform the Police better, UncleTomsEvilBrother Jun 2020 #17
From the deep state for trump zak247 Jun 2020 #10
I would hate to lose ground because of a badly worded sentence. tavernier Jun 2020 #11
We're making a mistake here... UncleTomsEvilBrother Jun 2020 #15
but we can certainly deny them mainstream support. stopdiggin Jun 2020 #43
its a loser topic for sure, its not about defunding as we will ALWAYS have cops of one type or beachbumbob Jun 2020 #12
The good thing is... UncleTomsEvilBrother Jun 2020 #18
I hope you're right about that . . . markpkessinger Jun 2020 #20
it's being sliced and diced right now (nt) stopdiggin Jun 2020 #44
Yep. "Defund the police" is bad framing. backscatter712 Jun 2020 #28
I don't think the topic is necessarily a loser . . . markpkessinger Jun 2020 #30
defund police unions nt msongs Jun 2020 #13
Picking Val Demings as VP might help diffuse this slogan PlanetBev Jun 2020 #16
"Police The Police!' Is a Far Better Slogan, Sir The Magistrate Jun 2020 #19
Agree, it may work with a greater amount of people mvd Jun 2020 #22
I agree that "Police the Police" is better . . . markpkessinger Jun 2020 #23
Under Any Slogan, Sir, You Can Carry Out a Desired Policy The Magistrate Jun 2020 #24
Good point! n/t markpkessinger Jun 2020 #26
If GOP was in charge of marketing, they'd call it "Improve the police" AlexSFCA Jun 2020 #21
The goal is to redirect some of the massive sums of money . . . markpkessinger Jun 2020 #25
We should be careful, though... UncleTomsEvilBrother Jun 2020 #29
If Our Activists Were Any Good At Framing For Mass Appeal, Sir The Magistrate Jun 2020 #31
Again, I agree, UncleTomsEvilBrother Jun 2020 #32
+1000 Hassler Jun 2020 #27
Disbanding the police is what was done in Camden, NJ in 2013 with great success. See the c-rational Jun 2020 #33
We should have a reform or Re Form movement.... Dorian Gray Jun 2020 #34
Such as...? ck4829 Jun 2020 #35
Demilitarizing SheltieLover Jun 2020 #36
But...but...but... EVERY police force needs a few of these... albacore Jun 2020 #39
Some would say it plays into the hands of our opponents...IOW right wing talking points pecosbob Jun 2020 #38
+1 n/t markpkessinger Jun 2020 #47
R-R-R Liberal In Texas Jun 2020 #40
We suck at marketing...let's put the Lincoln Project never-Trumpers on it... pecosbob Jun 2020 #41
If sloganeering is your focus then you are missing the whole point SoonerPride Jun 2020 #45
It is not about "sloganeering" . . . markpkessinger Jun 2020 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»For the love of God, can'...»Reply #10