Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
18. Agree with all, in particular the last sentence.
Wed Jun 17, 2020, 10:15 PM
Jun 2020

Money dominates innovation and distribution. Invention is not the same as innovation, invention is a clean break to something new, innovation is better tweaks off a defined base.

While I agree with the gist of your last sentence, my argument is that money controls all four, and therein lays society's problem. Money can fund many tweaks that allow it to control industries. Money controls distribution, a person can have invented the greatest new thing, but unless money gets behind that, the most likely outcome is failure and obscurity, there are periodic exceptions to that, where an invention is so earth shattering that the inventor can muscle his or her way into markets.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Maybe they need another tax cut BeyondGeography Jun 2020 #1
40 million unemployed probably more of a factor Under The Radar Jun 2020 #2
My wife and I are sending money we don't spend on movies, eating out, etc., to the food bank. hunter Jun 2020 #12
Admirable, you are so correct, default rates should be alarming for banks right now Under The Radar Jun 2020 #13
Those at the bottom are spending on what they Phoenix61 Jun 2020 #3
Wealthy people use assets to protect their own wealth bucolic_frolic Jun 2020 #4
This is exactly why tax cuts for the rich don't help. Working people spend every dime. Midnight Writer Jun 2020 #5
I am very concerned. Newest Reality Jun 2020 #6
If the only part of the economy to tank customerserviceguy Jun 2020 #7
Don't Forget $2,000-3,000 Shoes ProfessorGAC Jun 2020 #9
OMG! customerserviceguy Jun 2020 #14
this is why giving money to the poor is far better at stimulating the economy unblock Jun 2020 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author Ilsa Jun 2020 #10
The correct term is not "giving more money to the poor". Blue_true Jun 2020 #15
Agreed, my shorthand was sloppy unblock Jun 2020 #16
Agree with all, in particular the last sentence. Blue_true Jun 2020 #18
If you want to get depressed about it, read up on the invention of intermittent windshield wipers unblock Jun 2020 #19
I'm not spending much at all. House of Roberts Jun 2020 #11
Higher taxes on the wealthy. roamer65 Jun 2020 #17
I Am Not Buying This Talking Point erpowers Jun 2020 #20
That is the point IronLionZion Jun 2020 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Rich Have Stopped Spe...»Reply #18