Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Data for Progress/Civiqs is not a reliable polling firm. honest.abe Jun 2020 #1
That may be, Music Man Jun 2020 #4
I didnt say to dismiss it. honest.abe Jun 2020 #8
Fair enough :) Music Man Jun 2020 #11
You are probably correct about the situation but I would like to wait and see more polling. honest.abe Jun 2020 #14
They were incredibly accurate in their last New Hampshire Primary poll nt liskddksil Jun 2020 #5
One accurate poll does make a good pollster. honest.abe Jun 2020 #6
B/C - I'd call that worse than B-. It's an online survey, not a poll. lagomorph777 Jun 2020 #16
Yes. I would like to see another poll before writing off Amy. honest.abe Jun 2020 #19
I conversed with someone on FB about this Phoenix61 Jun 2020 #2
McGraft has currently has 19 million. Big Blue Marble Jun 2020 #9
The point is Booker's money is coming from within the state. kickitup Jun 2020 #10
I take that in the other direction. Music Man Jun 2020 #12
Well said Bradshaw3 Jun 2020 #3
Kentuckian here and you nailed it. kickitup Jun 2020 #7
I appreciate your insiders opinion. smirkymonkey Jun 2020 #13
Another Kentuckian here agreeing with your assessment Wanderlust988 Jun 2020 #15
Are you yourself saying not to consider ouside endorsements? LiberalFighter Jun 2020 #17
The people of KY favor Moscow Mitch over a blade of grass? Brainfodder Jun 2020 #18
I support Booker mvd Jun 2020 #20
Thanks for the insight Blasphemer Jun 2020 #21
Interesting comment. kentuck Jun 2020 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New Kentucky polls out, a...»Reply #17