Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,550 posts)
16. No, not as strictly.
Fri Jun 26, 2020, 08:02 PM
Jun 2020

But since hearsay is unreliable--the reason for the rule of evidence--basing Congressional formulation of policy on something that's unreliable seems in a sense worse than merely screwing up an individual's life because of confirmation bias.

They don't apply as rules. They should apply as simple common sense.

I've been dicked over by "well, the rules of evidence don't apply" sorts of logic, people hearing what somebody said somebody said, only to have the pile o' steamin' crap land on me. With "But I didn't say that" taken as confirmation, because otherwise why would I lie? (Yeah, that's the "logic".)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"5 Takeaways from Bill Ba...»Reply #16