Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I have Rape-Colored Skin [View all]Marcuse
(9,051 posts)45. Many light skinned people identified as white, but privilege came at a price.
The ability to pass oneself off as whiteto choose between living with their existing identity or adopt the dominant racial identityis the most extreme colorism privilege. Its not an option to which the vast majority of black Americans has access. In an ethnic group in which selling out or being an Uncle Tom are major taboos, itd be understandable if the discussion of passing focused on the supreme selfishness of the act. Passing is, at its essence, abandonment of the group to better the individual. And yet, the intra-community discussion about passing tends to avoid the question of the morality of the act. Instead, within the black community, family passing stories often serve other purposes: as a way of emphasizing the absurdity of race; as an example of a familys access to the privileges of colorism; as a trickster performance of the ultimate racial transgression.
Like many African American families, mine is pale as hell. Always has been, going back over a century. Most of my ancestors passed the notorious brown paper bag test, used by social clubs within the black community to discriminate against any person darker than a literal brown paper bag. My relatives were pale enough that, to people outside the black community, they might be confused for Latino or Native or mixed. But while genetically they were mixed with a combination of mostly African and European ancestry, ethnically and racially, they were black. Its just that some didnt look it. Because they were all descendants of generations of nonconsensual sex between the slave-owning class and their slave captives.
With the energetic discussion of mixed-race identity in the modern era, its important to point out that theres not a damn thing new about mixing between black and white people. Not only is it not a new phenomenon, it was a primary feature of American slavery. As a result, on average, African Americans have up to 24 percent European ancestry. By the end of Americas 246 years of slavery (16191865), there was so much generational intermixing, that there were a small minority of black slaves who, in all appearance, who looked 100 percent European.


https://www.topic.com/passing-in-moments
Like many African American families, mine is pale as hell. Always has been, going back over a century. Most of my ancestors passed the notorious brown paper bag test, used by social clubs within the black community to discriminate against any person darker than a literal brown paper bag. My relatives were pale enough that, to people outside the black community, they might be confused for Latino or Native or mixed. But while genetically they were mixed with a combination of mostly African and European ancestry, ethnically and racially, they were black. Its just that some didnt look it. Because they were all descendants of generations of nonconsensual sex between the slave-owning class and their slave captives.
With the energetic discussion of mixed-race identity in the modern era, its important to point out that theres not a damn thing new about mixing between black and white people. Not only is it not a new phenomenon, it was a primary feature of American slavery. As a result, on average, African Americans have up to 24 percent European ancestry. By the end of Americas 246 years of slavery (16191865), there was so much generational intermixing, that there were a small minority of black slaves who, in all appearance, who looked 100 percent European.


https://www.topic.com/passing-in-moments
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I disagree. To me the confederate statues are different. They celebrate and honor people
Dream Girl
Jul 2020
#8
Agree though I'm greatly pleased to see those monuments to the Old South coming down
Dream Girl
Jul 2020
#18
An article that uses strong language from someone to describe the white supremacist heritage of race
WhiskeyGrinder
Jul 2020
#16
I have often wondered why lightskinned AAs generally identified as AA and not...
TreasonousBastard
Jul 2020
#10
I remember the one-drop rule, and it became a horrific measure of worth...
TreasonousBastard
Jul 2020
#29
What makes it rape is the power differential of the two people, not that they're different races
StarfishSaver
Jul 2020
#39
YYou Want a Confederate Monument? My Body Is a Confederate Monument. Very powerful statement.
iluvtennis
Jul 2020
#40
"My Body Is a Confederate Monument." Heavy. Angela Davis couldn't have said it better.
jaxexpat
Jul 2020
#51