Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Interesting, though not surprising RZM Dec 2011 #1
Meh. My results (with spoiler alert): ieoeja Dec 2011 #2
+1 Seems the gist of the article is that rapist think like other men until.... Scuba Dec 2011 #3
Yep. People should be judged on actions, not thoughts Taverner Dec 2011 #30
meh... seabeyond Dec 2011 #5
" something like that, what can he do with it? " redqueen Dec 2011 #10
So, the topic is rapists and men's mags OriginalGeek Dec 2011 #4
well geez.... seabeyond Dec 2011 #6
sick ad Liberal_in_LA Dec 2011 #12
Something I'm not understanding guitar man Dec 2011 #7
"men are actually more likely to agree with the rapists" Union Scribe Dec 2011 #8
Though the majority of men are not rapists... RandomKoolzip Dec 2011 #17
Thanks for that, and I'll add: REP Dec 2011 #20
Yep. If a rapist says "I like chocolate ice cream"... Taverner Dec 2011 #31
I was able to differentiate 11/16 (with two errors both ways), but the number I agree or petronius Dec 2011 #9
This is just sad. redqueen Dec 2011 #11
How many mens magazines are there and how many back issues are there of those magazines? stevenleser Dec 2011 #13
What is the case that you you think they're trying to make? (nt) redqueen Dec 2011 #14
That there is no difference between the way regular men and rapists talk. nt stevenleser Dec 2011 #16
It seems to me they're focusing on lads' mags, not regular men. redqueen Dec 2011 #18
They dont exactly make that distinction clear in the article. nt stevenleser Dec 2011 #23
Nor this one... LanternWaste Dec 2011 #26
"Nor this one" what? Person asked me a question what I thought the point of the article was. stevenleser Dec 2011 #34
Exactly. Look at all the elipses being used Union Scribe Dec 2011 #15
That's an unfair assumption. redqueen Dec 2011 #19
Well I don't know what's been taken out, Union Scribe Dec 2011 #21
In formal and academic critiques... LanternWaste Dec 2011 #27
nonsense. if an academic is trying to support a particular conclusion, it's up to them to unblock Dec 2011 #33
Hm, I wonder how a 'can you tell the difference between a harlequin romance novel and police report' Edweird Dec 2011 #22
i think this is a provocative but academically worthless "study". unblock Dec 2011 #24
Nicely put. randome Dec 2011 #32
Eeew. lapislzi Dec 2011 #25
I haven't seen today's "men's magazines", but to me... Speck Tater Dec 2011 #28
This is from the article Lunacee2012 Dec 2011 #29
You know, maybe humanity dying out isn't so bad. Zhade Dec 2011 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»disturbing study - Can Yo...»Reply #23