Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: About AOC's one minute... [View all]George II
(67,782 posts)73. Calling that post passive aggressive is a bit insulting.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think a bigger presence of AOC would have been positive for us Dems looking for a Progressive
walkingman
Aug 2020
#8
Three of those republicans you talk about kept their remarks UNDER a minute. This convention....
George II
Aug 2020
#54
I truly hope you are right - but given their past performance (2016) I will wait and see. The
walkingman
Aug 2020
#77
I was having to multi-task when it started tonight, but I thought AOC had a minute ALSO during the
hlthe2b
Aug 2020
#10
Does anyone know who started this "just one minute" thing as if everybody else nominating
betsuni
Aug 2020
#16
The "childishness" was the implication that she was being treated unfairly, without mentioning
still_one
Aug 2020
#61
Not sure if a Businessinsider article started it, but if it did, she should've cleared it up
betsuni
Aug 2020
#23
The OP is right. When someone is asked to second a nomination, that person is not there
still_one
Aug 2020
#21
I would argue that the divisiveness was initiated by the person who neglected to inform people
still_one
Aug 2020
#34
and she did just fine during the nominating process tonight. This is such a petty issue
still_one
Aug 2020
#45
I agree, and it should have never been an issue. The argument some are using is about the
still_one
Aug 2020
#49
Neither is someone tweeting, with a clear implication how "unfair" it was to be given such a short
still_one
Aug 2020
#32
Does this tweet have something to do with the News media misrepresenting something?
still_one
Aug 2020
#37
The role AOC was given was to be part of the Bernie Sanders nomination process. I'm sure if she was
liskddksil
Aug 2020
#38
It was simply to second the nomination of Bernie Sanders. Whether it was for Biden or Sanders,
still_one
Aug 2020
#39
Nor do they hurt our chances. It is in fact, wholly benign... at its worst.
LanternWaste
Aug 2020
#87
That is a different issue. I don't know how much she lobbied for herself to be given a
still_one
Aug 2020
#64
Then she should have been more direct about it. Yang did, and he got a spot. As for your
still_one
Aug 2020
#67
Then Governor. What I am saying is that to determine if she has traction is to win a statewide
still_one
Aug 2020
#72
I can't recall where a House member became president. Perhaps such a thing has
Demsrule86
Aug 2020
#75
No she shouldn't have been given more time. First of all she is a first term
Demsrule86
Aug 2020
#74
Her seconding speech was almost twice as long as that of Biden's nominating speaker. Go figure.
George II
Aug 2020
#78