Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Mitch McConnell has taught us all a valuable lesson: [View all]BumRushDaShow
(167,575 posts)41. I wrote this in another thread about how to interpret Turtle-speak
If WE are in power and WE win, WE will decide who WE will nominate, and if YOU are in power and WE win (and control the Senate), WE will decide who WE will nominate (by BLOCKING YOUR NOMINATION), and if YOU are in power and WE lose, WE will decide who WE will nominate (if we control the Senate).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
While you are at it open DC & PR to statehood and pass the Wyoming rule to expand the House.
Statistical
Sep 2020
#8
I said several days ago that I was afraid we wouldn't take back the Senate and people were
Maraya1969
Sep 2020
#16
Not just seats to SCOTUS but also all the other federal courts will need to be expanded if we want
cstanleytech
Sep 2020
#28
30 years ago I would have said no but the Republicans have completely tossed the rules
cstanleytech
Sep 2020
#27
Fire with fire and it was their choice. A lot of good has been done with filibustering. Their ...
marble falls
Sep 2020
#54
That would require amending the Constitution itself which is alot harder than increasing the number
cstanleytech
Sep 2020
#62