Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

still_one

(92,189 posts)
2. They are arguing that since they effectively took out the individual mandate zeroing out a tax penal
Sat Sep 19, 2020, 08:02 PM
Sep 2020

they claim the coverage requirement is unconstitutional, making the rest of the ACA also unlawful

The argument ignores that Congress' choice to leave the ACA intact when it zeroed out the tax penalty.

I would like to think they don't have a very strong case, but who knows anymore


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How long, realistically, ...»Reply #2