Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Message auto-removed [View all] Name removed Sep 2020 OP
Q for Mrs. Barrett - howw can she be a handmaid to her spouse and on the Supreme Court... haele Sep 2020 #1
Actually: "Who is going to make the decision if you husband disagrees with your stance?" Maraya1969 Sep 2020 #4
Excellent question, which I trust Dems will hammer home in the hearings. klook Sep 2020 #20
She's an ideal model for EXPANDING THE COURT!!!!!! calimary Sep 2020 #25
This. Public servants swear oaths to fulfill their duties Hortensis Sep 2020 #22
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2020 #13
She believes the Holy Spirit lives in her, her actions are sanctioned by God & will sit by Jesus. TheBlackAdder Sep 2020 #2
Read some of these. Look at how many are not qualified. Frustratedlady Sep 2020 #3
Really, why not just nominate Michelle Bachman. BadgerMom Sep 2020 #17
Barrett is younger than Bachman jayschool2013 Sep 2020 #18
If the Dems get in power can they get rid of any of the Neanderthals? Maraya1969 Sep 2020 #5
Quick pic Roland99 Sep 2020 #6
Jeez, I knew this woman was a kook, but holy shit! GoCubsGo Sep 2020 #9
Check out this quote from the zealot: Roland99 Sep 2020 #10
Good gawd! I take it she's Catholic? GoCubsGo Sep 2020 #11
Yes, but the nutcase, Bill Barr type of Catholic...not the sane Joe Biden type Roland99 Sep 2020 #12
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2020 #14
It is ridiculous to have a federal judge who has never tried a case to preside over one! Dustlawyer Sep 2020 #7
It is ridiculous to have a federal judge who has never tried a case to preside over one! Dustlawyer Sep 2020 #8
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2020 #15
Like having a Secretary of Education who's never been BadgerMom Sep 2020 #16
Good analogy jayschool2013 Sep 2020 #19
Bingo! BadgerMom Sep 2020 #24
The quote @ the bottom of the bios is important for our democrary: "When injustice becomes Illumination Sep 2020 #21
Thanks for this link! smirkymonkey Sep 2020 #23
K&R UTUSN Sep 2020 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Message auto-removed