Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bradshaw3

(7,553 posts)
39. In some ways they were blindsided
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 01:11 PM
Sep 2020

That goes back to the 80s and 90s when Friedmanomics and so-called patriotism that was a reaction to the 60s and 70s were used to start dismantling some of the big changes the Democrats accomplished under FDR and LBJ, and to reward wealthy elites through defense spending and tax breaks. They used tools such as somewhat disguised racism, ALEC and the dubious underpinning of academics like Friedman to grab power. I don't think Democratic leaders were prepared for that onslaught. Of course it got supercharged with Tea Baggers and now the overt racism and naked, fascistic power grab of the current repugnant party and it. I don't think you can blame Obama for the total betrayal of American values that the repugs fought him with from the start.

Now, Democratic leaders can no longer claim to be blindsided. Yes, voting rights and many other things should have been worked on, but will they try for the systemic changes that are needed if they get the Senate and WH? They are all institutionalists and, unfortunately, many if not most of the institutions are not working now. The answer seems to be to vote, and I agree, but Democrats have been winning the cumulative vote in the overwhelming majority of national Congressional and Presidential elections for two decades and yet, here we are.

Things will go on as usual. Only worse. Autumn Sep 2020 #1
As it's been since 1980. n/t Yavin4 Sep 2020 #2
Yes. nt Autumn Sep 2020 #4
First - Win the election FBaggins Sep 2020 #3
vote him out..get the senate..pack the courts! samnsara Sep 2020 #5
This Aepps22 Sep 2020 #9
Can I come please? hamsterjill Sep 2020 #14
Nothing if Feinstein has her way. She opposes any significant changes to the court, like more seats LonePirate Sep 2020 #6
She's just about outlived ... LenaBaby61 Sep 2020 #10
Biden is on record as opposing it as well Polybius Sep 2020 #30
He has changed his mind actually. Nothing can be done with a filibuster. Demsrule86 Sep 2020 #32
Can you please post a link to him changing his mind? Polybius Sep 2020 #34
Google is your friend... Demsrule86 Sep 2020 #40
It's my enemy today Polybius Sep 2020 #49
Make DC and PR states after we win the WH and Senate in 6 weeks. OrlandoDem2 Sep 2020 #7
a good start NewJeffCT Sep 2020 #23
There won't be much of anything to do if Dems .... LenaBaby61 Sep 2020 #8
Not many means to slow down the process for Democrats frazzled Sep 2020 #12
Sorry .... LenaBaby61 Sep 2020 #15
Okay, since the New York Times doesn't satisfy you frazzled Sep 2020 #20
And that won't happen. WE have to win the election. Winning was always our only chance Demsrule86 Sep 2020 #33
no need to ask that question as we HAVE TO win first beachbumbob Sep 2020 #11
Even if we end up at a 53/47 or 54/46 Senate majority, not only will Celerity Sep 2020 #13
NOT expanding the High Court ... LenaBaby61 Sep 2020 #17
Oh, I agree, I would take it to 15. I just do not see the votes Celerity Sep 2020 #27
So baffling. I thought Bullock was going to be a lock :( n/t moonscape Sep 2020 #51
he has been getting hammered with a massive amount of Rethug negative adverts Celerity Sep 2020 #58
Thanks. What a shame he didn't moonscape Sep 2020 #59
he still can win, he needs Bloomberg and others to pour in a shedload of indirect funding Celerity Sep 2020 #60
That is bullshit. All Dems will vote to do away with the filibuster. Demsrule86 Sep 2020 #35
Focus on the election. We can't do a thing to stop the nomination. helpisontheway Sep 2020 #16
We won't be adding states, or packing the court or making any other institutional changes Bradshaw3 Sep 2020 #18
I think about that a lot Merlot Sep 2020 #24
In some ways they were blindsided Bradshaw3 Sep 2020 #39
I don't blame Obama, rather the democratic establishment Merlot Sep 2020 #50
I agree Bradshaw3 Sep 2020 #57
Stop. Democrats are a great party and part of the issue with our situation is people who Demsrule86 Sep 2020 #36
At least have Articles of Impeachment for Tя☭mp and Barr safeinOhio Sep 2020 #19
No, Our strategy is to win the election. Demsrule86 Sep 2020 #42
The best strategy is safeinOhio Sep 2020 #45
If we lose, there is no plan possible plan B. Demsrule86 Sep 2020 #48
Win in November first TheRealNorth Sep 2020 #21
Sweep the election ooky Sep 2020 #22
We'll start by winning the presidency and a majority in the Senate. MineralMan Sep 2020 #25
Because "we" don't have the power to respond directly. Yavin4 Sep 2020 #26
It is not conducive to winning to announce our intentions before the election. Demsrule86 Sep 2020 #37
Elect Biden, Thomas retires, balance tips back. Initech Sep 2020 #28
No, it wont balance back. Yavin4 Sep 2020 #29
Yeah I realized that. Initech Sep 2020 #38
Why would Thomas retire or Kavanaugh be impeached? Bradshaw3 Sep 2020 #41
Yeah the bad thing about this administration. Initech Sep 2020 #44
Term limits for SC Justices would require a Constitutional Amendment, dware Sep 2020 #55
Liberal Senate votes to remove Kavanaugh? dware Sep 2020 #54
Yeah true, that ain't happening. Initech Sep 2020 #56
Prepare for President-elect Biden's inauguration of course! Baclava Sep 2020 #31
Make DC and puerto rico states and stack the courts jorgevlorgan Sep 2020 #43
Dems have no choice but to play hardball or social liberalism / culture wars are over DSandra Sep 2020 #46
First goal is to win. Personally I'm for expanding the SC but it polls really, really badly, octoberlib Sep 2020 #47
Why do they have to? The system does not provide for "a response." treestar Sep 2020 #52
They won't do a thing. Zilch. d_b Sep 2020 #53
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump will get his SCOTUS...»Reply #39