Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If you had any doubt re: Chris Christie's karma at play, consider his debate prep "contribution" [View all]Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)17. I have asked for and not received a reliable source for that allegation. Do you have one?
Some random twitter account is not exactly a reliable source.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If you had any doubt re: Chris Christie's karma at play, consider his debate prep "contribution" [View all]
hlthe2b
Oct 2020
OP
I think so... He apparently did a Sirius interview the day Trump was diagnosed w COVID
hlthe2b
Oct 2020
#4
Everything single thing these repugnant bags o shit do backfires. There's your karma!
ResistantAmerican17
Oct 2020
#9
And If I were to debate Chris Christie ...I will throw him donut each time he tries to speak
Le Roi de Pot
Oct 2020
#11
Christy is a piece of shit. So glad it backfired in their faces BIG TIME. KARMA doesn't agree
Vivienne235729
Oct 2020
#14
I have asked for and not received a reliable source for that allegation. Do you have one?
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2020
#17
Perhaps you should show the tweeter is unreliable and also confront them with the allegation.
hlthe2b
Oct 2020
#18
No. It does not work that way. It is your claim, you have to support it
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2020
#24
It's your claim because you asserted it here. You have NO EVIDENCE & neither did the other thread.nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2020
#26
Nailed it: "One should not be quick to believe (much less redistribute) unverified ...." . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2020
#43
Word "stutter" or subword not mentioned once in whole article. No evidence of your stutter claim
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2020
#34
I realize you want so much to defend Christie. Perhaps his COVID-19 diagnosis has you so upset.
hlthe2b
Oct 2020
#36
What? I second Bernardo de La Paz's comment. As much as I'd love for it to be true, at this point
rainin
Oct 2020
#39
Nothing I wrote defends Christie. I defend critical thinking and oppose unsupported allegations.
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2020
#40