General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If you had any doubt re: Chris Christie's karma at play, consider his debate prep "contribution" [View all]Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)If you don't support it, then it remains a random twitter allegation.
That is widely recognized as a cheap debating tactic to make a wild claim and then demand that the other side do all the heavy lifting of evidence. It is the Number One tactic of Russian bots and the ilk they support. Join us and recognize it and refuse to indulge in it.
The other cheap debating tactic is to pose an unprovable negative and then demand that the other side prove it. What Sirius interview? When? Where is the link? At what time stamp? I'm not obligated to listen to a 10 minute / 20 minute / hour interview to find your evidence for you.
Finally, extraordinary claims demand extra ordinary evidence. Claiming illegal or unethical behaviour of a person is on the face of it extraordinary and demands proper supporting evidence. Apparently you have NO EVIDENCE.
It remains an unsupported random twitter allegation.