Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If you had any doubt re: Chris Christie's karma at play, consider his debate prep "contribution" [View all]rainin
(3,246 posts)41. Being rude doesn't make your evidence compelling. In fact, if your evidence were compelling
you could just stand on that. I'm amused at the irony, though...how you argue brashly and rudely while trying to call out Christie's unethical tactics. LOL
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If you had any doubt re: Chris Christie's karma at play, consider his debate prep "contribution" [View all]
hlthe2b
Oct 2020
OP
I think so... He apparently did a Sirius interview the day Trump was diagnosed w COVID
hlthe2b
Oct 2020
#4
Everything single thing these repugnant bags o shit do backfires. There's your karma!
ResistantAmerican17
Oct 2020
#9
And If I were to debate Chris Christie ...I will throw him donut each time he tries to speak
Le Roi de Pot
Oct 2020
#11
Christy is a piece of shit. So glad it backfired in their faces BIG TIME. KARMA doesn't agree
Vivienne235729
Oct 2020
#14
I have asked for and not received a reliable source for that allegation. Do you have one?
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2020
#17
Perhaps you should show the tweeter is unreliable and also confront them with the allegation.
hlthe2b
Oct 2020
#18
No. It does not work that way. It is your claim, you have to support it
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2020
#24
It's your claim because you asserted it here. You have NO EVIDENCE & neither did the other thread.nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2020
#26
Nailed it: "One should not be quick to believe (much less redistribute) unverified ...." . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2020
#43
Word "stutter" or subword not mentioned once in whole article. No evidence of your stutter claim
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2020
#34
I realize you want so much to defend Christie. Perhaps his COVID-19 diagnosis has you so upset.
hlthe2b
Oct 2020
#36
What? I second Bernardo de La Paz's comment. As much as I'd love for it to be true, at this point
rainin
Oct 2020
#39
Nothing I wrote defends Christie. I defend critical thinking and oppose unsupported allegations.
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2020
#40