Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Tyfairbanks600

(51 posts)

11. By that standard, you could also say the woman wanted a baby since she didn't use birth control pill

Reply to KS Toronado (Original post)

Fri Oct 16, 2020, 05:45 PM

Oct 2020

Or urge the man to use a condom.

I don’t think this is a very strong argument.

Really, I think it’s obvious that both men and women have unprotected sex without thinking much about the potential consequences. Acting like the man wanted a baby while having sex, but the woman didn’t, is pretty silly.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

First thing we need to do if they overturn Roe vs Wade [View all] KS Toronado Oct 2020 OP

Washington and Oregon Gov have put out doesn't matter, choice will be protected in our states. LizBeth Oct 2020 #1

Boom,.. kick 'em in the cookies. magicarpet Oct 2020 #2

Meh, kill the Hyde Amendment... Wounded Bear Oct 2020 #3

There you go wet dreaming again DamIfino Oct 2020 #4

We have enough child abuse without making children a punishment. Greybnk48 Oct 2020 #5

Another post-Roe statute suggested: no_hypocrisy Oct 2020 #6

Kill the filibuster and enshrine Roe v Wade into federal law. roamer65 Oct 2020 #7

Yes. This is the best option. Buckeyeblue Oct 2020 #8

And the man should have to pay the host since she had to carry the fetus for 9 months. fleur-de-lisa Oct 2020 #9

Violates tenth amendment Cicada Oct 2020 #10

By that standard, you could also say the woman wanted a baby since she didn't use birth control pill Tyfairbanks600 Oct 2020 #11