Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ⚠️BREAKING--Huge CDC study says #COVID19 not only caused 285,000 excess deaths-- [View all]muriel_volestrangler
(105,989 posts)15. But the pixels in those graphics are hard to measure
Could you really say from that "25-44 was over 50% higher than normal at times"?
If you go to the CDC site, and select excess deaths by age, and exclude 65+ (so that the vertical scale is better suited to the lower groups - even exclude 45-64 so that it doesn't have to show above 4,000), you can see that better.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
⚠️BREAKING--Huge CDC study says #COVID19 not only caused 285,000 excess deaths-- [View all]
kpete
Oct 2020
OP
So much for the "200,000 is overinflated because it includes cases with multiple CODs" nonsense.
GopherGal
Oct 2020
#4
it doesn't hit them at a high rate, but when it hits them it hits them hard
LymphocyteLover
Oct 2020
#30