Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(60,861 posts)
28. Not to mention, Kerry did NOT ignore the SBVT
Wed Oct 21, 2020, 12:00 PM
Oct 2020

He put his entire Navy record, received from the Navy, on his website - with the exclusion of medical records, which he allowed legitimate media to see. He also did include an answer - that the media was alerted to - when he spoke to the Firefighters. He essentially referred to the NAVY record, which he said was true 30 years before and it still was. The Vietnam era Secretary of the Navy, Republican John Warner, backed Kerry on his war record. They ignored that the SBVT included many people who NEVER severed with Kerry. They ignored that Kerry had the support of all but 1 person who had been on any of his swiftboats. In addition, Kerry had the support of the Republican marine (then law officer) he saved in Vietnam.

In addition, several claims of the SBVT were proven lies - they just moved on to the next set of accusations. Even though they were caught in lies - sometimes because they were NEVER in the same place and same time as Kerry - they just moved onto the next set of accusations. The problem was the cable media continued to give them coverage - often more time than they gave Kerry and the men actually on his boat, all but one of whom were extremely loyal to Kerry.

DU or the Kerry blog actually led me to read his online fitness reports. Someone referred to them to definitively answer what color his eyes are - hazel. That was less interesting then reading what was written in the late 1960s. His superiors describe an intelligent, creative, mature officer who many noted earned intense loyalty from those reporting to him. One thing I thought then, was that as those records were there - and were written before politics entered, someone in the media should have used them to define who 25 year old Kerry was. The closest thing to that was Doug Brinkley's book, but in the heat of 2004, a short article or cable analysis could really have helped.

As it was the PRINT media was not bad -- the ratings chasing cable media was not helpful.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No one cares except the idiots. BlueTsunami2018 Oct 2020 #1
Joe can pull out photos. Trump has his own hunter offspring problem. lagomorph777 Oct 2020 #35
no obamanut2012 Oct 2020 #2
No. This isn't getting anywhere near the traction as those other stories. Drunken Irishman Oct 2020 #3
He doesn't have to respond to anything from the ghoul. Kingofalldems Oct 2020 #4
I don't think so. If you're inclined to believe it, you're already voting for Trump. BusyBeingBest Oct 2020 #5
Except that Kerry was running for President and Hunter Biden isn't BannonsLiver Oct 2020 #6
Not to mention, Kerry did NOT ignore the SBVT karynnj Oct 2020 #28
No. Addressing it gives it credibility. honest.abe Oct 2020 #7
no one cares bigtree Oct 2020 #8
I have suggested elsewhere that he stand up to the bully... Moostache Oct 2020 #9
It was shown. Clearly fogged in Oct 2020 #29
This one? Moostache Oct 2020 #31
Yes, May of 16 in Ohio Clearly fogged in Oct 2020 #33
Hunter isn't running for president. LisaL Oct 2020 #10
This is the only thing that slightly bothers me ScratchCat Oct 2020 #26
Since when is it illegal to take your laptop for Rice4VP Oct 2020 #38
uhm who cares if the Q are "encouraged"? jcgoldie Oct 2020 #11
If brought up at the debate.... Mad Lib Oct 2020 #12
Well said. OnDoutside Oct 2020 #14
And Trump's Chinese bank account. LisaL Oct 2020 #18
Bring up the nepotism Midnightwalk Oct 2020 #30
I'm cool if he uses the explanation as a way to show himself as a loving parent. Bleacher Creature Oct 2020 #13
I don't know... BlueInPhilly Oct 2020 #15
I don't know what he should do, but he should have a quick, witty response to move on and not themaguffin Oct 2020 #16
No, he shouldn't. dware Oct 2020 #17
We said the same thing about the HRC campaign BlueInPhilly Oct 2020 #21
This ain't 2016, and our candidate isn't HRC, dware Oct 2020 #22
This story is getting no traction. Turin_C3PO Oct 2020 #23
That concerned Hillary herself and Comey was at the time BusyBeingBest Oct 2020 #34
Provide oxygen to a non-story is foolish. Statistical Oct 2020 #19
No. This is a bogus story that only Fox News is talking about. clutterbox1830 Oct 2020 #20
FOX News is all in on this story Johnny2X2X Oct 2020 #24
Seven days ago, Joe Biden denied the story as "Russian disinformation" gratuitous Oct 2020 #25
No. If it's a question from the moderator, then answer it. LakeArenal Oct 2020 #27
They will say "His denial just proves that it's true". There's no cure-all strategy... NurseJackie Oct 2020 #32
No. It's already been completely discredited. budkin Oct 2020 #36
His son is a grown man, let him address it Rice4VP Oct 2020 #37
Let them run with this nonsense. If it's not this, they will just attack with something else. Midnight Writer Oct 2020 #39
If Biden has a troubled son, which it sounds like he does Alhena Oct 2020 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Biden should directly add...»Reply #28