Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Senate "rules" *cough cough [View all] luv2fly Oct 2020 OP
Obviously, the rules only apply to Democrats. FoxNewsSucks Oct 2020 #1
Precisely Sherman A1 Oct 2020 #6
The Senate loves their rules until they don't Buckeyeblue Oct 2020 #2
Thr Republican Party has become corrupt and lawless Captain Zero Oct 2020 #4
Not just crushed but exposed Buckeyeblue Oct 2020 #5
I doubt the rules were written to allow the opposing party to protest and stop nominations or Hoyt Oct 2020 #3
If the shoe were on the other foot they would stunt like Evil Knievel. n/t rzemanfl Oct 2020 #8
We wouldn't accept it either. Allowing boycotts to stop legislation was not intent of rules. Hoyt Oct 2020 #9
I didn't write the rule, you didn't write the rule. rzemanfl Oct 2020 #10
I know it wasn't written to allow the other party to stop legislation by merely not showing up. Hoyt Oct 2020 #11
It's a Judiciary Committee Rule. n/t rzemanfl Oct 2020 #12
Still wasn't written to allow other party to stop nominations by not showing up. Hoyt Oct 2020 #13
It may have been written back when there was a functioning two-party system. n/t rzemanfl Oct 2020 #14
The shoe has been on the other foot FBaggins Oct 2020 #22
Different times. We used to have a functioning Congress. n/t rzemanfl Oct 2020 #24
Don't be ridiculous FBaggins Oct 2020 #26
The pot was stirred and left on the stove. Watch for a PM. n/t rzemanfl Oct 2020 #27
"Stirred and left on the stove" FBaggins Oct 2020 #30
Maybe once we take the Senate they can use the rule breaking to invalidate the confirmation cags Oct 2020 #7
Why wishful Iwasthere Oct 2020 #16
Really? dware Oct 2020 #17
Where does it say they can push through the nomination without the required two Dems Iwasthere Oct 2020 #19
Again, I ask, dware Oct 2020 #20
There are no "required Dems" in the Constitution FBaggins Oct 2020 #21
Thank you for saying this. dware Oct 2020 #23
Could this be a justification for impeachment if a nominee is approved by an improper process? n/t rainin Oct 2020 #15
Ok, she's impeached by the House, now what? dware Oct 2020 #18
Is that a yes, if we gain control of the Senate? rainin Oct 2020 #28
It takes 67 Senators to vote to convict and remove her, dware Oct 2020 #29
It is not OK malaise Oct 2020 #25
But yet it happens luv2fly Oct 2020 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Senate "rules" *cough c...»Reply #19