Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(15,134 posts)

1. IIRC Bush v Gore explicitly states that it cannot be cited as a precedent.

Sun Oct 25, 2020, 09:55 AM

Oct 2020

I'm not sure if what they're doing is citing it as a precedent, but if not, it's surely a close relative.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Here's how you know the GOP is asking the Supreme Court to rerun Bush v. Gore" [View all] Nevilledog Oct 2020 OP

That was before. They operate in a different reality. Nevilledog Oct 2020 #4

Their motto: "What Are You Gonna Do About It?" dalton99a Oct 2020 #6

IOKIARDI Kid Berwyn Oct 2020 #2

to many paper trails to hack the number of votes, least of the concerns beachbumbob Oct 2020 #8

Bush v Gore does not apply, and cannot be enforced Fiendish Thingy Oct 2020 #7

Aw ha!! The Sunday morning voice of sanity...thank you! Thekaspervote Oct 2020 #10