General Discussion

milestogo

(22,818 posts)

36. Joedog you need to spend more time watching Rachel Maddow.

Reply to Joedog (Original post)

Sun Nov 1, 2020, 09:34 PM

Nov 2020

She has the depth and gravitas that no other American journalist has, and she zeroes in to the heart of the matter.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

54 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Nicole Wallace [View all] Joedog Nov 2020 OP

She certainly covers more important information in her hour than Rachel. iemitsu Nov 2020 #1

She is a politician and former GOPer. Rachel is not. Rachel covers what pols do not. nt Boogiemack Nov 2020 #38

She is very good, but I totally disagree that there is anything amateur about Maddow. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2020 #2

Yes. elleng Nov 2020 #4

+1 jrthin Nov 2020 #28

+1 SheltieLover Nov 2020 #8

+1 ariadne0614 Nov 2020 #11

K. n/t rzemanfl Nov 2020 #23

Well written PJMcK Nov 2020 #13

Exactly, they focus on different things and both good at it. JI7 Nov 2020 #16

Exactly aquamarina Nov 2020 #20

+1 mitch96 Nov 2020 #39

I disagree. no_hypocrisy Nov 2020 #3

Note to self. 50 Shades Of Blue Nov 2020 #5

mmmm hmmm . . . Maru Kitteh Nov 2020 #47

Nicole was an insider. Of course she understands election campaigns better Buckeyeblue Nov 2020 #6

It's not an either or. mzmolly Nov 2020 #7

I like them both. Agree Wallace has a savviness that Racheal doesn't. Different life experiences Thekaspervote Nov 2020 #9

Rachel Maddow a amateur? GP6971 Nov 2020 #10

... LexVegas Nov 2020 #12

Real progressives don't batter one person down to elevate another, Mr. New User Tarc Nov 2020 #14

Rachel not your type, huh? Miigwech Nov 2020 #15

Maddow Joedog Nov 2020 #43

As an admirer, you might want to learn the correct spelling of her name. n/t ariadne0614 Nov 2020 #50

They're quite different. Rachel's show takes an awful lot more research and attention to detail OnDoutside Nov 2020 #51

I agree with your assessment of Nicole but I think you're selling Rachel short MustLoveBeagles Nov 2020 #17

There's one thing here I always read. n/t rzemanfl Nov 2020 #18

Profiles? LakeArenal Nov 2020 #44

... rzemanfl Nov 2020 #54

Apples and oranges. Maddow is a journalist with a left of center... brush Nov 2020 #19

Nicole's as quick minded as Rachel, which is a pleasant surprise. Greybnk48 Nov 2020 #21

This MustLoveBeagles Nov 2020 #22

I love seeing the three of them together for post-debate analysis. They are so sharp! Hekate Nov 2020 #32

YES! Silver Gaia Nov 2020 #35

I want to like Nicolle Wallace, but... LisaM Nov 2020 #24

. Squinch Nov 2020 #25

She's great. But makes Rachel look like an amateur? nolabear Nov 2020 #26

Nicole is part of the culture that created Trump. rickford66 Nov 2020 #27

PLEASE STOP!! WVGal1963 Nov 2020 #29

Different roles. Political analyst Or political strategist . Funtatlaguy Nov 2020 #30

Well, there you would be wrong. They each have different spheres of knowledge & experience... Hekate Nov 2020 #31

Speaking of looking like an amateur ... n/t NanceGreggs Nov 2020 #33

Don't you need to go warm up your truck or something? likesmountains 52 Nov 2020 #34

... DesertRat Nov 2020 #42

Joedog you need to spend more time watching Rachel Maddow. milestogo Nov 2020 #36

Wallace has savvy and Dr. Maddow has knowledge. Laffy Kat Nov 2020 #37

Both are politically savvy and knowledgeable DesertRat Nov 2020 #40

AND WHO THE HELL IS THIS Joedog???? a kennedy Nov 2020 #41

Nicole is great jcgoldie Nov 2020 #45

I disagree... Rice4VP Nov 2020 #46

I'd say Chris Hayes is second. DanTex Nov 2020 #49

When DUers close ranks in defense of fair analysis, it's a beautiful thing. ariadne0614 Nov 2020 #48

Apples and oranges. Rachel is better than almost anyone radius777 Nov 2020 #52

Wallace is the best interviewer on MSNBC DeminPennswoods Nov 2020 #53