Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

DanTex

(20,709 posts)

49. I'd say Chris Hayes is second.

Reply to Rice4VP (Reply #46)

Mon Nov 2, 2020, 09:20 AM

Nov 2020

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

54 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Nicole Wallace [View all] Joedog Nov 2020 OP

She certainly covers more important information in her hour than Rachel. iemitsu Nov 2020 #1

She is a politician and former GOPer. Rachel is not. Rachel covers what pols do not. nt Boogiemack Nov 2020 #38

She is very good, but I totally disagree that there is anything amateur about Maddow. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2020 #2

Yes. elleng Nov 2020 #4

+1 jrthin Nov 2020 #28

+1 SheltieLover Nov 2020 #8

+1 ariadne0614 Nov 2020 #11

K. n/t rzemanfl Nov 2020 #23

Well written PJMcK Nov 2020 #13

Exactly, they focus on different things and both good at it. JI7 Nov 2020 #16

Exactly aquamarina Nov 2020 #20

+1 mitch96 Nov 2020 #39

I disagree. no_hypocrisy Nov 2020 #3

Note to self. 50 Shades Of Blue Nov 2020 #5

mmmm hmmm . . . Maru Kitteh Nov 2020 #47

Nicole was an insider. Of course she understands election campaigns better Buckeyeblue Nov 2020 #6

It's not an either or. mzmolly Nov 2020 #7

I like them both. Agree Wallace has a savviness that Racheal doesn't. Different life experiences Thekaspervote Nov 2020 #9

Rachel Maddow a amateur? GP6971 Nov 2020 #10

... LexVegas Nov 2020 #12

Real progressives don't batter one person down to elevate another, Mr. New User Tarc Nov 2020 #14

Rachel not your type, huh? Miigwech Nov 2020 #15

Maddow Joedog Nov 2020 #43

As an admirer, you might want to learn the correct spelling of her name. n/t ariadne0614 Nov 2020 #50

They're quite different. Rachel's show takes an awful lot more research and attention to detail OnDoutside Nov 2020 #51

I agree with your assessment of Nicole but I think you're selling Rachel short MustLoveBeagles Nov 2020 #17

There's one thing here I always read. n/t rzemanfl Nov 2020 #18

Profiles? LakeArenal Nov 2020 #44

... rzemanfl Nov 2020 #54

Apples and oranges. Maddow is a journalist with a left of center... brush Nov 2020 #19

Nicole's as quick minded as Rachel, which is a pleasant surprise. Greybnk48 Nov 2020 #21

This MustLoveBeagles Nov 2020 #22

I love seeing the three of them together for post-debate analysis. They are so sharp! Hekate Nov 2020 #32

YES! Silver Gaia Nov 2020 #35

I want to like Nicolle Wallace, but... LisaM Nov 2020 #24

. Squinch Nov 2020 #25

She's great. But makes Rachel look like an amateur? nolabear Nov 2020 #26

Nicole is part of the culture that created Trump. rickford66 Nov 2020 #27

PLEASE STOP!! WVGal1963 Nov 2020 #29

Different roles. Political analyst Or political strategist . Funtatlaguy Nov 2020 #30

Well, there you would be wrong. They each have different spheres of knowledge & experience... Hekate Nov 2020 #31

Speaking of looking like an amateur ... n/t NanceGreggs Nov 2020 #33

Don't you need to go warm up your truck or something? likesmountains 52 Nov 2020 #34

... DesertRat Nov 2020 #42

Joedog you need to spend more time watching Rachel Maddow. milestogo Nov 2020 #36

Wallace has savvy and Dr. Maddow has knowledge. Laffy Kat Nov 2020 #37

Both are politically savvy and knowledgeable DesertRat Nov 2020 #40

AND WHO THE HELL IS THIS Joedog???? a kennedy Nov 2020 #41

Nicole is great jcgoldie Nov 2020 #45

I disagree... Rice4VP Nov 2020 #46

I'd say Chris Hayes is second. DanTex Nov 2020 #49

When DUers close ranks in defense of fair analysis, it's a beautiful thing. ariadne0614 Nov 2020 #48

Apples and oranges. Rachel is better than almost anyone radius777 Nov 2020 #52

Wallace is the best interviewer on MSNBC DeminPennswoods Nov 2020 #53