Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NOTE: No other developed country gets their polling THIS wrong this many times in favor of 1 party. [View all]Mr. Sparkle
(3,663 posts)23. Trump got 1 million more votes in Florida than in 2016, Joe Got 700,000 compared to Hillary.
That doesn't make any sense to me. Older voters were supposed to be abandoning Trump over covid, ex felons were allowed to vote for the first time.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
NOTE: No other developed country gets their polling THIS wrong this many times in favor of 1 party. [View all]
uponit7771
Nov 2020
OP
once towards one party, not 20 yrs towards one party even weighted towards that party.
uponit7771
Nov 2020
#2
The US LV voter is peered reviewed and fairly static data. On the data science side the US shouldn't
uponit7771
Nov 2020
#5
That's not going out on a limb in essentially a 2 person race, the sampling this time was tighter
uponit7771
Nov 2020
#11
Cahaly is wrong, I said the polls were weighted towards Trump this time and still had 2% MOEs.
uponit7771
Nov 2020
#13
chalay said one of their poll questions - who do you think your neighbors will vote for
AlexSFCA
Nov 2020
#14
That doesn't get the weighting that's needed, we can do better than anecdote questions. Other ....
uponit7771
Nov 2020
#15
No, we're mid to upper mid range polarized and still fuck up the polls towards Republicans in the
uponit7771
Nov 2020
#7
Give it back to League of Women Voters - didn't they have it for decades before Turdblossom?
Hestia
Nov 2020
#16
Or suppress them with military spec precision. Suppression is Bad Vlads key vote tool no doubt
uponit7771
Nov 2020
#34
I agree. Instead of having to win beyond 5% counting theft we have to push it to 9%.
LizBeth
Nov 2020
#8
Right ?! Then we'll still just be up .5% ... yeah, somethings wrong with somethin
uponit7771
Nov 2020
#9
What other Developed Country has a Major Party that denies evolution, supports shitty gun policies
JI7
Nov 2020
#18
We need stealth Democrats to infiltrate Republican ranks and find out what's going on
bucolic_frolic
Nov 2020
#20
+1, Tio Bernie (not Sanders) gives us a huge clue but it doesn't explain how wrong the polls are
uponit7771
Nov 2020
#30
+1, ... and democrats and pollsters not factoring it in to the degree it helps republicans
uponit7771
Nov 2020
#32
Trump got 1 million more votes in Florida than in 2016, Joe Got 700,000 compared to Hillary.
Mr. Sparkle
Nov 2020
#23
Despite all its deep math, careful evaluation of methodology, etc., polling has proven to be useless
MrModerate
Nov 2020
#25
Not in other developed countries this long towards one party. It like S Korea, either they're
uponit7771
Nov 2020
#33
Voter suppression works big time and is minimized to the nth degree by pollsters and dem party
uponit7771
Nov 2020
#41
Yes certainly that too, but it many instances this vote magic also seems too quick and too sweeping.
hadEnuf
Nov 2020
#43
