Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: It is not over yet. [View all]

Celerity

(54,366 posts)
3. and he still has the National State of Emergency ace up his sleeve
Thu Nov 19, 2020, 08:25 AM
Nov 2020

And to use it, all it takes is a the stroke of his sharpie.


The Alarming Scope of the President's Emergency Powers




https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/01/presidential-emergency-powers/576418/

snip

But will they? Unknown to most Americans, a parallel legal regime allows the president to sidestep many of the constraints that normally apply. The moment the president declares a “national emergency”—a decision that is entirely within his discretion—more than 100 special provisions become available to him. While many of these tee up reasonable responses to genuine emergencies, some appear dangerously suited to a leader bent on amassing or retaining power. For instance, the president can, with the flick of his pen, activate laws allowing him to shut down many kinds of electronic communications inside the United States or freeze Americans’ bank accounts. Other powers are available even without a declaration of emergency, including laws that allow the president to deploy troops inside the country to subdue domestic unrest.

This edifice of extraordinary powers has historically rested on the assumption that the president will act in the country’s best interest when using them. With a handful of noteworthy exceptions, this assumption has held up. But what if a president, backed into a corner and facing electoral defeat or impeachment, were to declare an emergency for the sake of holding on to power? In that scenario, our laws and institutions might not save us from a presidential power grab. They might be what takes us down.

1. “A LOADED WEAPON”

The premise underlying emergency powers is simple: The government’s ordinary powers might be insufficient in a crisis, and amending the law to provide greater ones might be too slow and cumbersome. Emergency powers are meant to give the government a temporary boost until the emergency passes or there is time to change the law through normal legislative processes. Unlike the modern constitutions of many other countries, which specify when and how a state of emergency may be declared and which rights may be suspended, the U.S. Constitution itself includes no comprehensive separate regime for emergencies. Those few powers it does contain for dealing with certain urgent threats, it assigns to Congress, not the president. For instance, it lets Congress suspend the writ of habeas corpus—that is, allow government officials to imprison people without judicial review—“when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it” and “provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions.”

Nonetheless, some legal scholars believe that the Constitution gives the president inherent emergency powers by making him commander in chief of the armed forces, or by vesting in him a broad, undefined “executive Power.” At key points in American history, presidents have cited inherent constitutional powers when taking drastic actions that were not authorized—or, in some cases, were explicitly prohibited—by Congress. Notorious examples include Franklin D. Roosevelt’s internment of U.S. citizens and residents of Japanese descent during World War II and George W. Bush’s programs of warrantless wiretapping and torture after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Abraham Lincoln conceded that his unilateral suspension of habeas corpus during the Civil War was constitutionally questionable, but defended it as necessary to preserve the Union.

The Supreme Court has often upheld such actions or found ways to avoid reviewing them, at least while the crisis was in progress. Rulings such as Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. Sawyer, in which the Court invalidated President Harry Truman’s bid to take over steel mills during the Korean War, have been the exception. And while those exceptions have outlined important limiting principles, the outer boundary of the president’s constitutional authority during emergencies remains poorly defined.

snip

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It is not over yet. [View all] kentuck Nov 2020 OP
Agreed Sherman A1 Nov 2020 #1
republicons are afraid what they have been up to will come out scarytomcat Nov 2020 #2
They've been on an unprecedented crime spree for four years. lagomorph777 Nov 2020 #18
and he still has the National State of Emergency ace up his sleeve Celerity Nov 2020 #3
Yes, there is that. kentuck Nov 2020 #4
putting the NSA gambit aside, the way I see things playing out are Celerity Nov 2020 #7
"5 Trump will try and destroy us for the next 4 years ", yep I don't believe people thinking Red Don uponit7771 Nov 2020 #10
Twitter, Facebook, & every other major social network need to instantly give him the ban hammer Celerity Nov 2020 #12
+1, hmmmm ... this would instantly help to a degree until Red Don is given a radio or TV platform uponit7771 Nov 2020 #13
I think Buden should try to find the strongest AG nominee he can find. kentuck Nov 2020 #17
You have always been a voice of reason kentuck, gab13by13 Nov 2020 #5
Dare I say this, gab13by13 Nov 2020 #6
I see that Netanyahu was quick to congratulate Biden for his victory? kentuck Nov 2020 #19
We need to win the Senate in order to crush the gop fully BSdetect Nov 2020 #8
+1, just simply reinstating the Voting Rights Act would GARUNTEE a 2% drop in presidential ... uponit7771 Nov 2020 #11
They have to Dec 11 IINM, after that who cares what they think uponit7771 Nov 2020 #9
Trump supporters hamsterjill Nov 2020 #14
True this. BBbats Nov 2020 #15
They are more like a Cult than a Party. kentuck Nov 2020 #16
They have a need to be part of a group hamsterjill Nov 2020 #29
He's going to do as much Turin_C3PO Nov 2020 #20
Who would order the Secret Service to do that? kentuck Nov 2020 #21
No. Turin_C3PO Nov 2020 #22
Makes sense. kentuck Nov 2020 #23
I kind of hope Trump Turin_C3PO Nov 2020 #25
He's been sniffing around for a war with Iran. Harker Nov 2020 #24
I agree. It's not over and here's my opinion. Firestorm49 Nov 2020 #26
Recall election in Georgia? Sedona Nov 2020 #27
This is why Moscow Mitch has been feverishly packing the courts... karin_sj Nov 2020 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It is not over yet.»Reply #3