General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Rebecca Solnit: On Not Meeting Nazis Halfway [View all]
A Long Interesting read. And for the record I have no interest in understanding the mind of a Magat. I don't want to be what they are and if you understand it, you can be it.
When Trump won the 2016 electionwhile losing the popular votethe New York Times seemed obsessed with running features about what Trump voters were feeling and thinking. These pieces treated them as both an exotic species and people it was our job to understand, understand being that word that means both to comprehend and to grant some sort of indulgence to. Now that Trump has lost the 2020 election, the Los Angeles Times has given their editorial page over to letters from Trump voters, who had exactly the sort of predictable things to say we have been hearing for far more than four years, thanks to the New York Times and what came to seem like about 11,000 other news outlets hanging on the every word of every white supremacist they could convince to go on the record.
The letters editor headed this section with, In my decade editing this page, there has never been a period when quarreling readers have seemed so implacably at odds with each other, as if they get their facts and values from different universes. As one small attempt to bridge the divide, we are providing today a page full of letters from Trump supporters. The implication is the usual one: weurban multiethnic liberal-to-radical only-partly-Christian Americaneed to spend more time understanding MAGA America. The demands do not go the other way. Fox and Ted Cruz and the Federalist have not chastised their audiences, I feel pretty confident, with urgings to enter into discourse with, say, Black Lives Matter activists, rabbis, imams, abortion providers, undocumented valedictorians, or tenured lesbians. When only half the divide is being tasked with making the peace, there is no peace to be made, but there is a unilateral surrender on offer. We are told to consider this bipartisanship, but the very word means both sides abandon their partisanship, and Mitch McConnell and company have absolutely no interest in doing that.
Paul Waldman wrote a valuable column in the Washington Post a few years ago, in which he pointed out that this discord is valuable fuel to right-wing operatives: The assumption is that if Democrats simply choose to deploy this powerful tool of respect, then minds will be changed and votes will follow. This belief, widespread though it may be, is stunningly naive. He notes that the sense of being disrespected doesnt come from the policies advocated by the Democratic Party, and it doesnt come from the things Democratic politicians say. Where does it come from? An entire industry thats devoted to convincing white people that liberal elitists look down on them. The right has a gigantic media apparatus that is devoted to convincing people that liberals disrespect them, plus a political party whose leaders all understand that that idea is key to their political project and so join in the chorus at every opportunity.
https://lithub.com/rebecca-solnit-on-not-meeting-nazis-halfway/?fbclid=IwAR0Y2v7y9gESjntnCVeMq0JnAU3_x1OREbk0TzPVbttrc0S1qSgkaCKT-oI