Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sarisataka

(18,654 posts)
15. Forgive me, I had thought that perhaps
Sun Nov 22, 2020, 07:10 PM
Nov 2020

Since you seem to have given this scenario some thought you may also have considered some options to respond.

At the core, there are two possibilities. The first is simply to accept it and have four more years of the same circus. With that precedence, the 2024 election is irrelevant as the PTB can simply install whoever they choose to the office.

The other choice is to not accept it. That opens a whole range of possibilities from having two competing Presidents to passive opposition to more active measures.

In either case, large numbers of people will be operating outside of any Constitutional framework. The last example of such a situation led to much bloodshed, although it is not a given that history will repeat itself.

If it goes to the supreme court then what? [View all] SlogginThroughIt Nov 2020 OP
cities with boarded up windows lapfog_1 Nov 2020 #1
If the sun burns out tomorrow, please tell me what you plan to do about it. Drunken Irishman Nov 2020 #2
Pretty sure there is a big difference SlogginThroughIt Nov 2020 #3
Not really. Both are improbable. Drunken Irishman Nov 2020 #7
DO you think they will appeal it to the supreme court? SlogginThroughIt Nov 2020 #10
I really don't care if they appeal to the Supreme Court... Drunken Irishman Nov 2020 #16
You win the thread. tritsofme Nov 2020 #22
Boom! StarfishSaver Nov 2020 #27
Ok. SlogginThroughIt Nov 2020 #30
It is fear porn. No serious legal scholar believes they have a prayer of success. Drunken Irishman Nov 2020 #34
Every court to date has laughed in their faces and called them idiots. LanternWaste Nov 2020 #24
Right. I think we can all agree that their cases are laughable SlogginThroughIt Nov 2020 #31
Then it's game fucking over. That's what. IsItJustMe Nov 2020 #29
If they allow that illegal action, then I want California to secede from the union, because the still_one Nov 2020 #4
No, we don't want California to secede from the Union because we need their electoral votes. Towlie Nov 2020 #18
If they throw out all the Democratic votes, and install trump, the country no longer exists still_one Nov 2020 #21
You and I are of the same mind. hamsterjill Nov 2020 #5
Very well said. EndlessWire Nov 2020 #11
Do you have any suggestions sarisataka Nov 2020 #6
THAT'S WHY I ASKED A QUESTION. SlogginThroughIt Nov 2020 #8
Never ask a question you don't already know the answer to. Politicub Nov 2020 #14
That's meant for lawyers examining witnesses in court. Towlie Nov 2020 #20
Forgive me, I had thought that perhaps sarisataka Nov 2020 #15
When in the Course of human events... Retrograde Nov 2020 #9
what is "it"? milestogo Nov 2020 #12
They'd basically be ruling to end the United States, Crunchy Frog Nov 2020 #13
The results of a good four states or so would have to be overturned coti Nov 2020 #17
Enough with people like you telling others what to do SlogginThroughIt Nov 2020 #19
You're clearly pretty aggravated and not at your best mentally. coti Nov 2020 #23
You have absolutely no idea who I am SlogginThroughIt Nov 2020 #25
Oddly enough, the corollary seems to apply to you. LanternWaste Nov 2020 #28
Just asking a question and wondering if ther eis any recourse SlogginThroughIt Nov 2020 #36
True, I'm only familiar with the belligerant behavior you're presenting here. coti Nov 2020 #35
+1000 greenjar_01 Nov 2020 #26
No point Turin_C3PO Nov 2020 #32
Who would it go to? Since Roberts is the justice for D.C. and Federal District, would it go to him? OregonBlue Nov 2020 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If it goes to the supreme...»Reply #15