General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Was Jesus real? [View all]PoindexterOglethorpe
(28,395 posts)How did he charge it?
In any case, Pilate and Caiaphas are historical figures we already know about. The tablet you refer to makes no reference to Jesus.
A few years back there was something found that supposedly refers to (I may have the name wrong, so forgive me on this) "James, brother of Jesus" which was soon enough proven to be a forgery. Same with the supposed Wife of Jesus Gospel.
There are absolutely no actual legitimate historical documents or contemporary anything that have any verifiable anything about Jesus.
Two thousand years from now, people will uncover fragments of modern day novels, and will conclude, for instance, the Hercule Poirot is a real person, and go nuts trying to find proof he lived.
I'm inclined to think that a more believable explanation is that a group of people about 100 years after Jesus's supposed lifetime who were a member of a particular Jewish cult, got together and concocted a more or less consistent account of his fictitious life and voila! The New Testament.