Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: No one can explain "Defund the Police" or "Abolish the Police" as well as activists can. [View all]NotANeocon
(465 posts)24. "DefundThe police"?It is - and will remain - an inane meaningless slogan without definitive meaning.
There are many many ways of saying "re-purpose Police budgets" but the originators refused to adopt reason.
After being destroyed for years by Frank Luntz and his contribution to "Rethug Daily Talking Points" you would think progressives had at least learned how to do the same and how to recognize and correct when they have royally fucked up.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Luntz
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No one can explain "Defund the Police" or "Abolish the Police" as well as activists can. [View all]
StrictlyRockers
Dec 2020
OP
No, slogans like that make it easy to dismiss the problem and possible solutions. n/t
PoliticAverse
Dec 2020
#10
This is not about "bashing Democratic activists" it's about the effectiveness of a slogan.
PoliticAverse
Dec 2020
#13
Democratic activists say they love the slogan and it's the perfect slogan.
StrictlyRockers
Dec 2020
#14
Because to you disagreeing is "bashing" - and you wonder why you can't have a productive dialog. n/t
PoliticAverse
Dec 2020
#15
If the Dems had embraced the causes of the left, they would have won seats
StrictlyRockers
Dec 2020
#65
Are you still with this old argument? We lost 12 House seats, almost our whole...
brush
Dec 2020
#71
Good, then you admit you're wrong, and you have nothing to prove this crazy claim.
StrictlyRockers
Dec 2020
#72
I think the mistake is in thinking that every voter is willing to invest time and energy
Rorey
Dec 2020
#30
While you're insisting on that slogan, why not shoot yourself in the foot for good measure?
Squinch
Dec 2020
#3
Exactly. De-militarize is good. Anything is better than defund the police which...
brush
Dec 2020
#22
Number of people shot to death by the police in the United States from 2017 to 2020, by race
Klaralven
Dec 2020
#7
Sure...a 'slogan' can destroy the strongest of candidates. That is what you don't see.
Demsrule86
Dec 2020
#59
What leads you to allege we're stuck with it and it's "the right thing to do"
LanternWaste
Dec 2020
#20
"DefundThe police"?It is - and will remain - an inane meaningless slogan without definitive meaning.
NotANeocon
Dec 2020
#24
People with marketing experience don't become street activists, because they have figured out
Blue_true
Dec 2020
#52
People with marketing experience don't become street activists, because they have figured out
Blue_true
Dec 2020
#53
And I would add they need experience in winning elections and what it takes.
Demsrule86
Dec 2020
#60
Which is why "abolish the police" is a better one. It speaks for itself.
WhiskeyGrinder
Dec 2020
#29
What are they going to do? Seriously, these scenarios are so rare and even more rarely end...
Humanist_Activist
Dec 2020
#43