Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

There is no free lunch. Voltaire2 Dec 2020 #1
The areas benefitting from solar in the desert have proper conditions to produce their own solar ripcord Dec 2020 #3
Right. Various sets of costs and benefits to all possible actions. Hortensis Dec 2020 #11
Negawatts are always best Blues Heron Dec 2020 #2
Yes, tell people in Southern Cal to turn off their air conditioning. former9thward Dec 2020 #36
Ok! Socal - turn it down! Blues Heron Dec 2020 #37
Work that wedge, baby greenjar_01 Dec 2020 #4
Federal land in the South West is vast. Edwards AFB alone is 470 square miles in size Kaleva Dec 2020 #5
Rooftop solar should be required in Los Angeles ripcord Dec 2020 #8
the new rooftop solar law for new housing went into effect Jan 1 Blues Heron Dec 2020 #38
Or you could build one tiny nuclear plant there... hunter Dec 2020 #10
Relatively speaking, solar farms, even the biggest, are not large. Kaleva Dec 2020 #14
Oh, so that makes it all right to clear with bulldozers for solar panels. hunter Dec 2020 #28
I hate those. I hate wind turbines as well. These are fronts for the filthy gas fracking industry. hunter Dec 2020 #6
Okay,try this. Wellstone ruled Dec 2020 #7
So why aren't solar farms going up around Las Vegas? ripcord Dec 2020 #9
Two new ones are Wellstone ruled Dec 2020 #21
If we were serious, we'd be building more nuclear plants Sympthsical Dec 2020 #12
No, it is dangerous and then there is the waste issue...I would rather use gas then nuclear. Demsrule86 Dec 2020 #18
I agree with you Yeehah Dec 2020 #31
Tell me what you do support, not what you don't. Iggo Dec 2020 #13
I'm not a fan of Hydro Dams on the Skagit or the Columbia, either. maxsolomon Dec 2020 #15
Why aren't the areas using the power makng the sacrifices? ripcord Dec 2020 #17
Rooftops ARE getting PV installs all over urban America. maxsolomon Dec 2020 #19
You couldn't produce enough IMHO. Demsrule86 Dec 2020 #20
Cool story, bro. RandiFan1290 Dec 2020 #16
The problem we have here in NM is the solar produced by wind farms is going out of state womanofthehills Dec 2020 #22
Seems (not *is*, but *seems) simply self-absorbed and short-sighted rather than anti-environment. LanternWaste Dec 2020 #23
Rooftop Sgent Dec 2020 #24
"...am I anti environment?" myohmy2 Dec 2020 #25
Desert solar isn't ideal, but perhaps more practical. tinrobot Dec 2020 #26
No. Leave the desert and public lands alone. Rooftop solar. jeffreyi Dec 2020 #27
Putting them in the desert works fine for me. NurseJackie Dec 2020 #29
I'm a big fan of individual production. Arthur_Frain Dec 2020 #30
Point source generation is better and localized... 2naSalit Dec 2020 #32
Well, fortunately for desert-lovers, we'll be seeing a lot coti Dec 2020 #33
I think solar farms are a bad idea. I think they should be on roofs. That way demigoddess Dec 2020 #34
as far as cost, it could be part of your mortgage. demigoddess Dec 2020 #35
Eventually there will be a number of cities around the world running off of fusion reactors Klaralven Dec 2020 #39
Those then being the only two end-results you can envision? LanternWaste Dec 2020 #40
Rooftop solar is not magic caraher Dec 2020 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If I don't support losing...»Reply #40