Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Ms. Toad

(34,059 posts)

2. That's the major argument for lifetime appointments.

Reply to Mr.Bill (Original post)

Tue Dec 8, 2020, 07:08 PM

Dec 2020

Over time, judges appointed for life are freer to reject the death penalty (you don't have to kill people to prove you are tough on crime), to agree with the person responsible for your income at the end of your term, etc. They tend to move left, rather than right.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I have changed my mind about a belief I have had for years. [View all] Mr.Bill Dec 2020 OP

Exactly! Zoonart Dec 2020 #1

That's the major argument for lifetime appointments. Ms. Toad Dec 2020 #2

No one should be appointed for life for anything. old guy Dec 2020 #3

And that's exactly why it was set up that way in the first place. The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2020 #4

they can't be bribed? stillcool Dec 2020 #5

Occasionally they have been; a few federal judges were impeached for bribery. The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2020 #6

And that's why Roberts has become a swing vote TexasBushwhacker Dec 2020 #7

You are correct Nictuku Dec 2020 #8