Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

obamanut2012

(29,411 posts)
37. I literally was just going to post this about NC
Wed Dec 9, 2020, 09:34 AM
Dec 2020

Yup, NC's votes need to be tossed then, too.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

why is texas NOT wanting to throw out texas electoral votes? nt msongs Dec 2020 #1
Hmmmm Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2020 #2
As someone else pointed out... regnaD kciN Dec 2020 #4
I can't speak to the rest dsc Dec 2020 #28
I literally was just going to post this about NC obamanut2012 Dec 2020 #37
I wanna know why they left out AZ, NV, and MN. Nevilledog Dec 2020 #6
Their shortsightedness should trip them up DFW Dec 2020 #3
Yes. So far SCOTUS has refused involvement. I'd like to think "resents" Hortensis Dec 2020 #5
It's kind of a parallel to Gore's team demanding a recount of only a couple of counties instead of jaxexpat Dec 2020 #30
Overturning the election is the new Obamacare repeal Generic Brad Dec 2020 #7
I have a question GrassClippings Dec 2020 #8
Stuff like changing election laws to allow for more mail-in voting, drop boxes, etc. n/t pnwmom Dec 2020 #9
It alleges that those states didn't conduct their elections properly. Frasier Balzov Dec 2020 #12
That seems like an odd argument Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2020 #33
The larger outcome is clearly what they're complaining about. Frasier Balzov Dec 2020 #40
So this is essentially the "We would have won if MI, PA, WI, GA, and AZ didn't exist" argument? Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2020 #42
Didn't exist or were more like us lol. n/t Frasier Balzov Dec 2020 #43
Exactly Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2020 #49
This happens with all suits. Always. Even this farce. It's procedural with ALL suits. Saboburns Dec 2020 #10
TY! Not panicking.. anxious until Cha Dec 2020 #13
Everyone is anxious. The assaults just don't stop! NutmegYankee Dec 2020 #22
Best of LUCK for Democracy! Cha Dec 2020 #11
NEXT: Texas sues Michigan, Iowa, Minnesota, etc. for not executing people dalton99a Dec 2020 #14
No chance they hear it budkin Dec 2020 #15
Oh, FFS RandySF Dec 2020 #16
All the Democratic states should sue TX, KY, FL, IA, SC for their horrible senators LeftInTX Dec 2020 #17
Hello? ahlnord Dec 2020 #21
Ooppss...I don't even know how I ended up typing MN...Can't remember what state I was thinking of.. LeftInTX Dec 2020 #23
Oh Gosh...Maine...that's what it was thinking...wrong abbreviation...Susan Collins... LeftInTX Dec 2020 #44
Minnesota has 2 Dem Senators, Klobuchar Cha Dec 2020 #24
I know..I fixed it LeftInTX Dec 2020 #25
No Worries.. All Good.. Cha Dec 2020 #26
How do these lawsuits get heard so fast blueinredohio Dec 2020 #18
Original jurisdiction Sympthsical Dec 2020 #20
I thought that case was dismissed. speaknow Dec 2020 #19
That's what I wonder. How does Texas have standing in this case? Buns_of_Fire Dec 2020 #32
It doesn't but they have to receive it to declare no standing grantcart Dec 2020 #47
If they accept this case to hear , duforsure Dec 2020 #27
Sounds like a recipe Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2020 #34
Texas AG pushing Trump's lawsuits to score a pardon for all of his scandals (bribe?) UCmeNdc Dec 2020 #29
+1 dalton99a Dec 2020 #38
I think they want to hear this... Takket Dec 2020 #31
Not likely onenote Dec 2020 #35
That's what I'm wondering. Dr. Strange Dec 2020 #46
The response should be a laugh track. This is the dumbest lawsuit in the history of lawsuits. Vinca Dec 2020 #36
Response from whom? honest.abe Dec 2020 #39
That was my first thought ScratchCat Dec 2020 #45
STUPID fucking lawsuit BUT bluestarone Dec 2020 #41
Yes, and so that Trump can keep raising money. Mike 03 Dec 2020 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BREAKING: SCOTUS wants re...»Reply #37