General Discussion

Proud Liberal Dem

(25,015 posts)

42. So this is essentially the "We would have won if MI, PA, WI, GA, and AZ didn't exist" argument?

Reply to Frasier Balzov (Reply #40)

Wed Dec 9, 2020, 11:47 AM

Dec 2020

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

49 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

BREAKING: SCOTUS wants response to Texas suit by Thursday at 3 PM [View all] brooklynite Dec 2020 OP

why is texas NOT wanting to throw out texas electoral votes? nt msongs Dec 2020 #1

Hmmmm Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2020 #2

As someone else pointed out... regnaD kciN Dec 2020 #4

I can't speak to the rest dsc Dec 2020 #28

I literally was just going to post this about NC obamanut2012 Dec 2020 #37

I wanna know why they left out AZ, NV, and MN. Nevilledog Dec 2020 #6

Their shortsightedness should trip them up DFW Dec 2020 #3

Yes. So far SCOTUS has refused involvement. I'd like to think "resents" Hortensis Dec 2020 #5

It's kind of a parallel to Gore's team demanding a recount of only a couple of counties instead of jaxexpat Dec 2020 #30

Overturning the election is the new Obamacare repeal Generic Brad Dec 2020 #7

I have a question GrassClippings Dec 2020 #8

Stuff like changing election laws to allow for more mail-in voting, drop boxes, etc. n/t pnwmom Dec 2020 #9

It alleges that those states didn't conduct their elections properly. Frasier Balzov Dec 2020 #12

That seems like an odd argument Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2020 #33

The larger outcome is clearly what they're complaining about. Frasier Balzov Dec 2020 #40

So this is essentially the "We would have won if MI, PA, WI, GA, and AZ didn't exist" argument? Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2020 #42

Didn't exist or were more like us lol. n/t Frasier Balzov Dec 2020 #43

Exactly Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2020 #49

This happens with all suits. Always. Even this farce. It's procedural with ALL suits. Saboburns Dec 2020 #10

TY! Not panicking.. anxious until Cha Dec 2020 #13

Everyone is anxious. The assaults just don't stop! NutmegYankee Dec 2020 #22

Best of LUCK for Democracy! Cha Dec 2020 #11

NEXT: Texas sues Michigan, Iowa, Minnesota, etc. for not executing people dalton99a Dec 2020 #14

No chance they hear it budkin Dec 2020 #15

Oh, FFS RandySF Dec 2020 #16

All the Democratic states should sue TX, KY, FL, IA, SC for their horrible senators LeftInTX Dec 2020 #17

Hello? ahlnord Dec 2020 #21

Ooppss...I don't even know how I ended up typing MN...Can't remember what state I was thinking of.. LeftInTX Dec 2020 #23

Oh Gosh...Maine...that's what it was thinking...wrong abbreviation...Susan Collins... LeftInTX Dec 2020 #44

Minnesota has 2 Dem Senators, Klobuchar Cha Dec 2020 #24

I know..I fixed it LeftInTX Dec 2020 #25

No Worries.. All Good.. Cha Dec 2020 #26

How do these lawsuits get heard so fast blueinredohio Dec 2020 #18

Original jurisdiction Sympthsical Dec 2020 #20

I thought that case was dismissed. speaknow Dec 2020 #19

That's what I wonder. How does Texas have standing in this case? Buns_of_Fire Dec 2020 #32

It doesn't but they have to receive it to declare no standing grantcart Dec 2020 #47

If they accept this case to hear , duforsure Dec 2020 #27

Sounds like a recipe Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2020 #34

Texas AG pushing Trump's lawsuits to score a pardon for all of his scandals (bribe?) UCmeNdc Dec 2020 #29

+1 dalton99a Dec 2020 #38

I think they want to hear this... Takket Dec 2020 #31

Not likely onenote Dec 2020 #35

That's what I'm wondering. Dr. Strange Dec 2020 #46

The response should be a laugh track. This is the dumbest lawsuit in the history of lawsuits. Vinca Dec 2020 #36

Response from whom? honest.abe Dec 2020 #39

That was my first thought ScratchCat Dec 2020 #45

STUPID fucking lawsuit BUT bluestarone Dec 2020 #41

Yes, and so that Trump can keep raising money. Mike 03 Dec 2020 #48