Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Pantagruel

(2,580 posts)

4. I just proposed that

Reply to Nevilledog (Original post)

Fri Dec 11, 2020, 04:00 PM

Dec 2020

Media outlets should henceforth refuse the 126 any airtime whatsoever. They are avowed enemies of the democratic process by signing on to this, deny them media exposure. Any future story in which they appear should clearly identify them as signers of the shameful amicus brief designed to author a virtual coup.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Pascrell demands 126 members seeking to overturn election not be seated in Congress [View all] Nevilledog Dec 2020 OP

This is a very sane and proper response randr Dec 2020 #1

Exactly. It's part of Congress's Powers. Chin music Dec 2020 #5

I wish they could/would do this but I have no idea about the actual procedures or laws... wcmagumba Dec 2020 #2

There was actually a Supreme Court case the jist of which is Congress can't refuse to seat PoliticAverse Dec 2020 #7

'Legally' elected Proud liberal 80 Dec 2020 #10

"Congress can't refuse to seat legally elected representatives" Pantagruel Dec 2020 #12

Well in 4 states anyway. And if Congress bought that argument they'd have to not seat the Democrats PoliticAverse Dec 2020 #13

Do you recall Roland Burris (D-IL) BumRushDaShow Dec 2020 #25

That's the Senate, not the House. Different rules. scarletwoman Dec 2020 #26

Each chamber does their own rules BumRushDaShow Dec 2020 #29

Link to the Supreme Court case to which you are referring: scarletwoman Dec 2020 #27

THAT'S WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. Chin music Dec 2020 #3

I just proposed that Pantagruel Dec 2020 #4

I wish the media would do that Proud liberal 80 Dec 2020 #11

I hope they can mAke it happen! KewlKat Dec 2020 #6

Agreed! Can you imagine the size of the protests if we weren't in the middle of a pandemic? usajumpedtheshark Dec 2020 #8

K&R 2naSalit Dec 2020 #9

Just do it. Nt BootinUp Dec 2020 #14

since we're living in an era of breaking norms ... nebby70 Dec 2020 #15

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Dec 2020 #32

Certainly beats trying to play patty cakes with them Ponietz Dec 2020 #16

NEW letter from Pascrell Nevilledog Dec 2020 #17

Exactly, and they should review and sign the oath of office too, redo it, since they seemed to have SWBTATTReg Dec 2020 #20

Here are these traitors. But you don't see gangs of democrats outside their homes, BComplex Dec 2020 #18

I love this! soothsayer Dec 2020 #19

It's a well-earned public shaming that will not age well for each and every one of them bucolic_frolic Dec 2020 #21

K&R smirkymonkey Dec 2020 #22

Wow! I like the cut of Pascrell's jib. PatrickforO Dec 2020 #23

up to 126..the fascists are falling in line. mountain grammy Dec 2020 #24

Hear, Hear! peggysue2 Dec 2020 #28

Let them wear their Scarlet Letter. ffr Dec 2020 #30

The Democratic party should be taking out ads bluecollar2 Dec 2020 #31

Right. Dems and the media ought to be harping on the Rs' treachery. Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2020 #33

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Dec 2020 #34