Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: REJECTED! [View all]GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)88. Not really. They feel constitutionally the court had the obligation to take up cases between states
Probably because it is explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. Originalist and all.
But they state they would not have granted relief.
So actually 9-0 against Texas.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They would still not have supported the remedy...they just thougt the should take the case...so
Demsrule86
Dec 2020
#68
As far as court cases, probably, but I think the fascists have one more trick up their sleeves
yaesu
Dec 2020
#54
And it gains them nothing...some drama and then it is over...the don't have the House thank God.
Demsrule86
Dec 2020
#69
Here's the unsigned order. Alito and Thomas dissenting in part. No mention of the three justices...
demmiblue
Dec 2020
#19
not a lawyer but i think it sounds like Thomas & Alito said the idiots have the right to file but it
onetexan
Dec 2020
#51
Right. Rachel Maddow just said that a little bit ago - that those 2 justices have long held that
onetexan
Dec 2020
#81
"Least relevant DU commentary competition?" Sorry, too much context to qualify. Try SHE WAS 1ST!!
NBachers
Dec 2020
#72
He would not grant relief thus take the case and find against Texas...so really it is 9-0
Demsrule86
Dec 2020
#71
Now can we charge them all with sedition to undermine democracy and our Constitution?
world wide wally
Dec 2020
#32
It's actually not 7-2. It's 9-0. Alito and Thomas make clear they would hear the case but not grant
demmiblue
Dec 2020
#34
GREAT NEWS!!!! Everyone knew that would be the decision, but seeing if in black and white....
George II
Dec 2020
#36
Any chance we can have Texas' outcome overturned? Looks like that whole government is corrupt.
ffr
Dec 2020
#37
Not really. They feel constitutionally the court had the obligation to take up cases between states
GulfCoast66
Dec 2020
#88
"Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State
ancianita
Dec 2020
#56
With an entry on the docket Trump is castrated. Now let's gear up to hold these traitors accountable
Pepsidog
Dec 2020
#58
With an entry on the docket Trump is castrated. Now let's gear up to hold these traitors accountable
Pepsidog
Dec 2020
#59