General Discussion

redqueen

(115,186 posts)

75. Who's 'anti sex'?

Tue Jan 10, 2012, 11:39 AM

Jan 2012

There is a serious shortage of logic in here when a handful of people decide that rather than discuss an issue on its merits, they instead resort to twisting words, misrepresenting arguments, etc.

I don't think anyone on DU is anti-sex. Objectification, dehumanization, and hypersexualization are not synonymous with sex. I feel sorry for the handful of DUers who apparently can't tell the difference, or who still don't understand what these terms even mean/are still in denial about their existence.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

186 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] Burgman Jan 2012 OP

who will tell barbtries Jan 2012 #1

wow burgman. start a thread to dismiss very real womens issue. no surprise there. seabeyond Jan 2012 #2

I have no fucking clue as to what you are trying to say here. Burgman Jan 2012 #6

+1 Charlemagne Jan 2012 #19

Copy that. You'll need it later, too. Occulus Jan 2012 #66

ya, right, cause once again you are off base. you do get, all the people that "get it", right? seabeyond Jan 2012 #69

Generally you reply to the thread that offends you. GeorgeGist Jan 2012 #150

Nearly every DU jury on which I've served... Atman Jan 2012 #9

I know what he's talking about here too. RevStPatrick Jan 2012 #12

Posting a thread about another thread is also against the rules, no? Atman Jan 2012 #14

Juvinile? Burgman Jan 2012 #16

Then you should have rebutted on that thread. RevStPatrick Jan 2012 #20

a thread calling out another thread? 3rd rule broken. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #31

I saw we leave this thread up Charlemagne Jan 2012 #33

Right? Telling a feminist "blow me"... redqueen Jan 2012 #74

Where was that, i read it last night, can't find it now uppityperson Jan 2012 #106

It's the hidden post in this thread. redqueen Jan 2012 #110

Thank you, thought I read this last night in another thread. uppityperson Jan 2012 #120

that is why ally is in quotes Charlemagne Jan 2012 #109

Would telling Santorum to blow me be okay? snooper2 Jan 2012 #130

That was a DU2 rule. Hosts on DU3 are leaving MineralMan Jan 2012 #38

thank you. i didnt know a thread joking about masturbation met SOP. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #39

Just barely. The real subject of this thread MineralMan Jan 2012 #44

thanks for the explanation MM. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #48

Glad you figured out what is "over sensitive" jberryhill Jan 2012 #35

A piss-poor rebuttal, then muriel_volestrangler Jan 2012 #47

You could have attempted your rebuttal in MineralMan Jan 2012 #50

doesnt meet SOP of gd. copy cat not allowed in GD. i am the issue? really? nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #25

exactly Charlemagne Jan 2012 #29

and the men in this thread, doing the happy dance, are the ones best at dismissing womens concerns seabeyond Jan 2012 #30

Shaka. When the walls fell. LeftyMom Jan 2012 #61

like the Op, you have to be participating to "get it". that is not my problem. it is yours seabeyond Jan 2012 #63

Darmok on the ocean. LeftyMom Jan 2012 #65

silly girl. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #70

I just got her point and it is an interesting one but I am not sure you will appreciate it. stevenleser Jan 2012 #92

go for it. but, i bet it is going to have the same end result that every reply seabeyond Jan 2012 #95

I wonder what the point would be. redqueen Jan 2012 #98

no, this person never engages. stalks, insults, and runs away. clever.... lol. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #102

Ma'am, that's a personal attack. LeftyMom Jan 2012 #172

it is a description and explanation of what YOU continually do on my posts. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #174

Dear God, I do believe that was a complete sentence. LeftyMom Jan 2012 #179

OK, first off, 'Darmok' is an episode in the old series Star Trek the Next Generation stevenleser Jan 2012 #105

species appears to speak English. seabeyond Jan 2012 #111

You at least attempt to make yourself understood. redqueen Jan 2012 #114

Well, I am curious to know what she thinks of my explanation, assuming she doesnt have me on ignore stevenleser Jan 2012 #115

ah hahaha seabeyond Jan 2012 #117

I have to say that I think what she tried to do was extremely interesting. The problem with these stevenleser Jan 2012 #118

That's hilarious. redqueen Jan 2012 #122

To a STTNG fan, what someone is trying to say with a Darmok reference is unmistakeable stevenleser Jan 2012 #125

you are not listening steven. i told you the history, so that should be clear now. seabeyond Jan 2012 #127

what are you not getting. regularly on my thread she makes a reference like this seabeyond Jan 2012 #123

I understand you are frustrated by how she tried to do what she did stevenleser Jan 2012 #129

You admit you're unaware of the pattern... redqueen Jan 2012 #132

Why is this so hard for you to understand? It is completely straightforward. stevenleser Jan 2012 #135

wow. insightful. ok. lol. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #137

This message was self-deleted by its author MineralMan Jan 2012 #168

You do need the history MattBaggins Jan 2012 #141

This message was self-deleted by its author Bunny Jan 2012 #144

Yes, you are wrong. stevenleser Jan 2012 #145

i have never seen anything like this. and i have been here a long time. seabeyond Jan 2012 #147

Are you the Steven Leser at that link in your signature line? MineralMan Jan 2012 #169

That question sounds like it is going somewhere pretty personal. Please PM me. nt stevenleser Jan 2012 #182

It's just a question. You have the same screen name as the person MineralMan Jan 2012 #183

you dont understand, because i am not frustrated. it doesnt bother me. she thinks she is so clever seabeyond Jan 2012 #133

This message was self-deleted by its author fizzgig Jan 2012 #160

Sokath! His eyes uncovered! Dr. Strange Jan 2012 #67

Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra. The beast at Tanagra. stevenleser Jan 2012 #89

Oh my. I just got your point here. Very clever. nt stevenleser Jan 2012 #91

Yes Mistress Froward69 Jan 2012 #152

Then I'm a violent mother f_cker. Sky Masterson Jan 2012 #3

LOL Mr Dixon Jan 2012 #5

and this woman fully admits the same..... Maine-ah Jan 2012 #17

I need an intervention Sky Masterson Jan 2012 #73

Beating. Yanking. Choking. Jerking. Codeine Jan 2012 #4

You forgot "flogging." Atman Jan 2012 #11

And "pounding, whipping", and several others. MineralMan Jan 2012 #51

If some folks are turned on by S&M or whatever.. Upton Jan 2012 #59

That's not my point, and you know it. MineralMan Jan 2012 #77

+1 Charlemagne Jan 2012 #21

DU now has its own Anti-Sex League. Just ask Alice . . . leveymg Jan 2012 #7

I have noticed an authoritarian bent hootinholler Jan 2012 #37

Petty dictators now have a fresh opportunity to do what they couldn't before: not be ignored. leveymg Jan 2012 #46

all the lonely... lonely men. i think the problem is their lack of sex. hence, these issues, lmao seabeyond Jan 2012 #49

For every lonely man there's a Material Girl. Any contract takes at least two parties. leveymg Jan 2012 #52

i think this thread is ALL about men. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #53

You may fantasize as you like. leveymg Jan 2012 #58

what does that have to do with the OP or his misogyny. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #60

I thought that was odinism, not misogyny. Which do you have on your mind today? leveymg Jan 2012 #62

i need not.... lmao. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #64

Lol. eom leveymg Jan 2012 #71

Lack of sex? More like fear of having it because we might be seen as violent The Straight Story Jan 2012 #108

i dont know. i tell my boys make sure girl is as enthusiastic as you. good way to avoid rape seabeyond Jan 2012 #113

You may have a problem with that one--- snooper2 Jan 2012 #136

ya, well, then it is a good piece of advice seabeyond Jan 2012 #140

Love how some folks will misrepresent arguments redqueen Jan 2012 #124

Actually the ladies have been rather nice to try and not paint MattBaggins Jan 2012 #142

i think i love you.... seabeyond Jan 2012 #148

Preach it! redqueen Jan 2012 #151

oiy... Whisp Jan 2012 #146

Yes Mistress Froward69 Jan 2012 #153

Who's 'anti sex'? redqueen Jan 2012 #75

That's a very interesting question, isn't it? MineralMan Jan 2012 #80

They sure do. redqueen Jan 2012 #96

Don't laugh.. Upton Jan 2012 #8

They'll have to pry my cold, dead hand off my... Atman Jan 2012 #10

There are exactly three or perhaps four core members Occulus Jan 2012 #83

LOL, poor poor Occulus n/t Scout Jan 2012 #85

I know I have to run to the store now for more tissues MattBaggins Jan 2012 #143

I believe you're correct DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2012 #165

Is that why they call it choking the chicken? liberal N proud Jan 2012 #13

If you boys posting on this thread really honestly want to know why you never "get laid", Zorra Jan 2012 #15

I'm near 60. Grew up in the 60's & 70's Burgman Jan 2012 #18

Try not to worry about this. Pacafishmate Jan 2012 #23

Thanks! More food for thought for the boys who want to understand Zorra Jan 2012 #99

Zorra, your gender's internal plumbing has exactly zero appeal to me Occulus Jan 2012 #116

You are completely misrepresenting what I said. redqueen Jan 2012 #126

they gotta win. they have to misrepresent to argue. that is the only way it can be argued. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #128

Precisely. (nt) redqueen Jan 2012 #139

Occulus? You seem to be misunderstanding redqueen, and me as well. Zorra Jan 2012 #154

no. he doesnt care. just a jab here and a jab there seabeyond Jan 2012 #159

I'm hoping for more clarity and understanding. Zorra Jan 2012 #164

ya. and i have enjoyed your posts and hearing what you have to say. agreed. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #167

Wow. 60 years old and this is your idea redqueen Jan 2012 #22

Post removed Post removed Jan 2012 #24

You cant say blow me Charlemagne Jan 2012 #26

LOL! Burgman Jan 2012 #27

Classy. redqueen Jan 2012 #28

a really really hot 60 yr old, though. lol. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #32

I'm not surprised to see this childish backlash. redqueen Jan 2012 #34

weeeve my porn and hookers alone, or all those blue pills are seabeyond Jan 2012 #41

heavens...I certainly hope he does not have female children or grandchildren.. hlthe2b Jan 2012 #57

It's also possible that they recognized the patriarchy on their own, redqueen Jan 2012 #72

Context please??? Odin2005 Jan 2012 #36

He can't answer because he had a thread hidden for telling redqueen to perform oral sex on him. N/t demmiblue Jan 2012 #42

he is being sexually repressed. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #43

. demmiblue Jan 2012 #45

Oh, yuck! Odin2005 Jan 2012 #54

This is a very weak retort to the thread it's mocking, MineralMan Jan 2012 #40

"I'd say that this copycat thread is FAIL." zappaman Jan 2012 #90

BAAAHAHAhahaha!! "Wah! My orders for someone to metaphorically penetrate themselves on my phallus RadiationTherapy Jan 2012 #55

Keep evolving, people, we're gonna get there. seabeyond Jan 2012 #56

Most of us, anyway. redqueen Jan 2012 #76

It used to be the vast majority and not just the sad few. It's happening and it will get better. RadiationTherapy Jan 2012 #97

Thank you for your words of encouragement. redqueen Jan 2012 #100

In countries where masturbation has reached dangereous levels reorg Jan 2012 #68

Wow. This is one of the strangest threads I've ever read on DU. Atman Jan 2012 #78

actually, the boxers are in a twist. but again, you are not aware of the issue, obviously. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #79

That's why I wear briefs, instead of boxers. MineralMan Jan 2012 #81

that is fuckin funny MM. lol seabeyond Jan 2012 #84

The boxers v. briefs controversy MineralMan Jan 2012 #87

White cotton briefs are for little boys and teenagers. RadiationTherapy Jan 2012 #104

Well, I don't wear white cotton briefs. MineralMan Jan 2012 #112

Well, I am a bit hyper-sensitive about the amount of arrested development I see among adults; RadiationTherapy Jan 2012 #138

I made an honest effort to stay out of this MrCoffee Jan 2012 #156

Thank you, thank you. RadiationTherapy Jan 2012 #157

And they're just ugly. redqueen Jan 2012 #161

I really don't pay much attention to what kind of underwear MineralMan Jan 2012 #162

lmfao.... ya, i HAD to go into the stores to buy undies for guys. i didnt notice all those pictures seabeyond Jan 2012 #163

Atman, rather than making assumptions with repsect to Camille Paglia writings/comparisons-- hlthe2b Jan 2012 #88

I would expect nothing more than thoughtless kneejerking from most people. redqueen Jan 2012 #101

I didn't see the thread linked. Atman Jan 2012 #103

I had no problem finding it in GD--this is, after all a copy cat thread--if you had really wanted to hlthe2b Jan 2012 #134

I'm sorry I'm not good enough for your sanctimonious ass. Atman Jan 2012 #170

I have not been incivil to you... It does speak volumes that you reply in this manner. hlthe2b Jan 2012 #171

If you don't think your response was uncivil, then therein lies the problem. Atman Jan 2012 #173

how many people have clued you in before your second post to rant about panties? how many people seabeyond Jan 2012 #176

Calling someone an ass is your definition of civility... Ummm ok. I think your derision of others hlthe2b Jan 2012 #177

Please. redqueen Jan 2012 #180

The same three of you, responding to every post. Atman Jan 2012 #184

I'm responding to every post? redqueen Jan 2012 #185

Masturbation is also a form of safe sex. William769 Jan 2012 #82

Plus it's pretty much guaranteed MineralMan Jan 2012 #86

your post is offensive, so yah, stop fucking around with us. Whisp Jan 2012 #93

Amen +1000 - Douglas Carpenter Jan 2012 #94

I think you tell more about yourself than you want to reveal Whisp Jan 2012 #107

I think they work very hard at not getting it. redqueen Jan 2012 #131

only jackoffs jack off! Suji to Seoul Jan 2012 #119

Not to mention the terms that go along with the practice.... jorno67 Jan 2012 #121

lofl uponit7771 Jan 2012 #149

I have no idea... sledwreck13 Jan 2012 #155

Every sperm is sacred KamaAina Jan 2012 #158

This is a cheap-shot thread DeathToTheOil Jan 2012 #166

I just want to say... redqueen Jan 2012 #181

You're doing it wrong! LOL. AtomicKitten Jan 2012 #175

Ha! whatchamacallit Jan 2012 #178

So this thread calls out the "Prostitution is Violence" thread Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2012 #186