Bar complaint filed against Trump attorneys in Arizona

[SunSeeker]

34. You definitely don't know perjury law. It has to be a "material" fact.

You're the one who needs to "look it up." Start with 18 U.S. Code § 1621, which defines perjury as "an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true" [emphasis mine].

As any Google search of perjury law will teach you:

Only a “material” statement can be perjury. The false statement must be capable of influencing the proceeding – that is, it must have a relationship to the subject of the proceeding. This includes a false statement that would tend to mislead or hamper an investigation. This means that a lie, even under oath, about a subject that is not material to the proceeding is not perjury. For example, falsely bragging that “I never update my Facebook page at work,” while testifying in a case having nothing to do with social networking at work, would not be a likely candidate for a perjury charge.

https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/crime-penalties/federal/perjury.htm

But no, you gotta bash Bill Clinton, claiming he could have been jailed. Unfuckingbelievable.