General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Let's talk about AOC. [View all]Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Democrats were stealing the election, HAD stolen the election, then attempted to overset the electoral apparatus and popular vote to steal the election, and failed when democracy worked as it was supposed to.
In another election, another candidate, not a Republican, did effectively the same thing, including months of lying that Democrats were stealing elections in state after state, and similarly ended with failure to subvert the popular vote because the democratic process worked as it was supposed to.
Now, it may be that some approve these activities when it's their candidate and disapprove when it's someone else's.
To me, there is NO difference. Doesn't matter which party subversive candidates and their hopeful followers may be with, they're all on my shit list.
Hope that clarifies my meaning sufficiently.