General Discussion

redqueen

(115,186 posts)

126. You are completely misrepresenting what I said.

Tue Jan 10, 2012, 01:17 PM

Jan 2012

I dam not calling them victims. I am asserting that their desire to sell their body, IMO, does not outweigh the importance or protecting victims of human trafficking or other members of society who are coerced into prostitution.

That's all there is to it. It's quite simple, really.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

186 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] Burgman Jan 2012 OP

who will tell barbtries Jan 2012 #1

wow burgman. start a thread to dismiss very real womens issue. no surprise there. seabeyond Jan 2012 #2

I have no fucking clue as to what you are trying to say here. Burgman Jan 2012 #6

+1 Charlemagne Jan 2012 #19

Copy that. You'll need it later, too. Occulus Jan 2012 #66

ya, right, cause once again you are off base. you do get, all the people that "get it", right? seabeyond Jan 2012 #69

Generally you reply to the thread that offends you. GeorgeGist Jan 2012 #150

Nearly every DU jury on which I've served... Atman Jan 2012 #9

I know what he's talking about here too. RevStPatrick Jan 2012 #12

Posting a thread about another thread is also against the rules, no? Atman Jan 2012 #14

Juvinile? Burgman Jan 2012 #16

Then you should have rebutted on that thread. RevStPatrick Jan 2012 #20

a thread calling out another thread? 3rd rule broken. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #31

I saw we leave this thread up Charlemagne Jan 2012 #33

Right? Telling a feminist "blow me"... redqueen Jan 2012 #74

Where was that, i read it last night, can't find it now uppityperson Jan 2012 #106

It's the hidden post in this thread. redqueen Jan 2012 #110

Thank you, thought I read this last night in another thread. uppityperson Jan 2012 #120

that is why ally is in quotes Charlemagne Jan 2012 #109

Would telling Santorum to blow me be okay? snooper2 Jan 2012 #130

That was a DU2 rule. Hosts on DU3 are leaving MineralMan Jan 2012 #38

thank you. i didnt know a thread joking about masturbation met SOP. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #39

Just barely. The real subject of this thread MineralMan Jan 2012 #44

thanks for the explanation MM. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #48

Glad you figured out what is "over sensitive" jberryhill Jan 2012 #35

A piss-poor rebuttal, then muriel_volestrangler Jan 2012 #47

You could have attempted your rebuttal in MineralMan Jan 2012 #50

doesnt meet SOP of gd. copy cat not allowed in GD. i am the issue? really? nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #25

exactly Charlemagne Jan 2012 #29

and the men in this thread, doing the happy dance, are the ones best at dismissing womens concerns seabeyond Jan 2012 #30

Shaka. When the walls fell. LeftyMom Jan 2012 #61

like the Op, you have to be participating to "get it". that is not my problem. it is yours seabeyond Jan 2012 #63

Darmok on the ocean. LeftyMom Jan 2012 #65

silly girl. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #70

I just got her point and it is an interesting one but I am not sure you will appreciate it. stevenleser Jan 2012 #92

go for it. but, i bet it is going to have the same end result that every reply seabeyond Jan 2012 #95

I wonder what the point would be. redqueen Jan 2012 #98

no, this person never engages. stalks, insults, and runs away. clever.... lol. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #102

Ma'am, that's a personal attack. LeftyMom Jan 2012 #172

it is a description and explanation of what YOU continually do on my posts. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #174

Dear God, I do believe that was a complete sentence. LeftyMom Jan 2012 #179

OK, first off, 'Darmok' is an episode in the old series Star Trek the Next Generation stevenleser Jan 2012 #105

species appears to speak English. seabeyond Jan 2012 #111

You at least attempt to make yourself understood. redqueen Jan 2012 #114

Well, I am curious to know what she thinks of my explanation, assuming she doesnt have me on ignore stevenleser Jan 2012 #115

ah hahaha seabeyond Jan 2012 #117

I have to say that I think what she tried to do was extremely interesting. The problem with these stevenleser Jan 2012 #118

That's hilarious. redqueen Jan 2012 #122

To a STTNG fan, what someone is trying to say with a Darmok reference is unmistakeable stevenleser Jan 2012 #125

you are not listening steven. i told you the history, so that should be clear now. seabeyond Jan 2012 #127

what are you not getting. regularly on my thread she makes a reference like this seabeyond Jan 2012 #123

I understand you are frustrated by how she tried to do what she did stevenleser Jan 2012 #129

You admit you're unaware of the pattern... redqueen Jan 2012 #132

Why is this so hard for you to understand? It is completely straightforward. stevenleser Jan 2012 #135

wow. insightful. ok. lol. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #137

This message was self-deleted by its author MineralMan Jan 2012 #168

You do need the history MattBaggins Jan 2012 #141

This message was self-deleted by its author Bunny Jan 2012 #144

Yes, you are wrong. stevenleser Jan 2012 #145

i have never seen anything like this. and i have been here a long time. seabeyond Jan 2012 #147

Are you the Steven Leser at that link in your signature line? MineralMan Jan 2012 #169

That question sounds like it is going somewhere pretty personal. Please PM me. nt stevenleser Jan 2012 #182

It's just a question. You have the same screen name as the person MineralMan Jan 2012 #183

you dont understand, because i am not frustrated. it doesnt bother me. she thinks she is so clever seabeyond Jan 2012 #133

This message was self-deleted by its author fizzgig Jan 2012 #160

Sokath! His eyes uncovered! Dr. Strange Jan 2012 #67

Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra. The beast at Tanagra. stevenleser Jan 2012 #89

Oh my. I just got your point here. Very clever. nt stevenleser Jan 2012 #91

Yes Mistress Froward69 Jan 2012 #152

Then I'm a violent mother f_cker. Sky Masterson Jan 2012 #3

LOL Mr Dixon Jan 2012 #5

and this woman fully admits the same..... Maine-ah Jan 2012 #17

I need an intervention Sky Masterson Jan 2012 #73

Beating. Yanking. Choking. Jerking. Codeine Jan 2012 #4

You forgot "flogging." Atman Jan 2012 #11

And "pounding, whipping", and several others. MineralMan Jan 2012 #51

If some folks are turned on by S&M or whatever.. Upton Jan 2012 #59

That's not my point, and you know it. MineralMan Jan 2012 #77

+1 Charlemagne Jan 2012 #21

DU now has its own Anti-Sex League. Just ask Alice . . . leveymg Jan 2012 #7

I have noticed an authoritarian bent hootinholler Jan 2012 #37

Petty dictators now have a fresh opportunity to do what they couldn't before: not be ignored. leveymg Jan 2012 #46

all the lonely... lonely men. i think the problem is their lack of sex. hence, these issues, lmao seabeyond Jan 2012 #49

For every lonely man there's a Material Girl. Any contract takes at least two parties. leveymg Jan 2012 #52

i think this thread is ALL about men. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #53

You may fantasize as you like. leveymg Jan 2012 #58

what does that have to do with the OP or his misogyny. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #60

I thought that was odinism, not misogyny. Which do you have on your mind today? leveymg Jan 2012 #62

i need not.... lmao. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #64

Lol. eom leveymg Jan 2012 #71

Lack of sex? More like fear of having it because we might be seen as violent The Straight Story Jan 2012 #108

i dont know. i tell my boys make sure girl is as enthusiastic as you. good way to avoid rape seabeyond Jan 2012 #113

You may have a problem with that one--- snooper2 Jan 2012 #136

ya, well, then it is a good piece of advice seabeyond Jan 2012 #140

Love how some folks will misrepresent arguments redqueen Jan 2012 #124

Actually the ladies have been rather nice to try and not paint MattBaggins Jan 2012 #142

i think i love you.... seabeyond Jan 2012 #148

Preach it! redqueen Jan 2012 #151

oiy... Whisp Jan 2012 #146

Yes Mistress Froward69 Jan 2012 #153

Who's 'anti sex'? redqueen Jan 2012 #75

That's a very interesting question, isn't it? MineralMan Jan 2012 #80

They sure do. redqueen Jan 2012 #96

Don't laugh.. Upton Jan 2012 #8

They'll have to pry my cold, dead hand off my... Atman Jan 2012 #10

There are exactly three or perhaps four core members Occulus Jan 2012 #83

LOL, poor poor Occulus n/t Scout Jan 2012 #85

I know I have to run to the store now for more tissues MattBaggins Jan 2012 #143

I believe you're correct DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2012 #165

Is that why they call it choking the chicken? liberal N proud Jan 2012 #13

If you boys posting on this thread really honestly want to know why you never "get laid", Zorra Jan 2012 #15

I'm near 60. Grew up in the 60's & 70's Burgman Jan 2012 #18

Try not to worry about this. Pacafishmate Jan 2012 #23

Thanks! More food for thought for the boys who want to understand Zorra Jan 2012 #99

Zorra, your gender's internal plumbing has exactly zero appeal to me Occulus Jan 2012 #116

You are completely misrepresenting what I said. redqueen Jan 2012 #126

they gotta win. they have to misrepresent to argue. that is the only way it can be argued. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #128

Precisely. (nt) redqueen Jan 2012 #139

Occulus? You seem to be misunderstanding redqueen, and me as well. Zorra Jan 2012 #154

no. he doesnt care. just a jab here and a jab there seabeyond Jan 2012 #159

I'm hoping for more clarity and understanding. Zorra Jan 2012 #164

ya. and i have enjoyed your posts and hearing what you have to say. agreed. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #167

Wow. 60 years old and this is your idea redqueen Jan 2012 #22

Post removed Post removed Jan 2012 #24

You cant say blow me Charlemagne Jan 2012 #26

LOL! Burgman Jan 2012 #27

Classy. redqueen Jan 2012 #28

a really really hot 60 yr old, though. lol. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #32

I'm not surprised to see this childish backlash. redqueen Jan 2012 #34

weeeve my porn and hookers alone, or all those blue pills are seabeyond Jan 2012 #41

heavens...I certainly hope he does not have female children or grandchildren.. hlthe2b Jan 2012 #57

It's also possible that they recognized the patriarchy on their own, redqueen Jan 2012 #72

Context please??? Odin2005 Jan 2012 #36

He can't answer because he had a thread hidden for telling redqueen to perform oral sex on him. N/t demmiblue Jan 2012 #42

he is being sexually repressed. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #43

. demmiblue Jan 2012 #45

Oh, yuck! Odin2005 Jan 2012 #54

This is a very weak retort to the thread it's mocking, MineralMan Jan 2012 #40

"I'd say that this copycat thread is FAIL." zappaman Jan 2012 #90

BAAAHAHAhahaha!! "Wah! My orders for someone to metaphorically penetrate themselves on my phallus RadiationTherapy Jan 2012 #55

Keep evolving, people, we're gonna get there. seabeyond Jan 2012 #56

Most of us, anyway. redqueen Jan 2012 #76

It used to be the vast majority and not just the sad few. It's happening and it will get better. RadiationTherapy Jan 2012 #97

Thank you for your words of encouragement. redqueen Jan 2012 #100

In countries where masturbation has reached dangereous levels reorg Jan 2012 #68

Wow. This is one of the strangest threads I've ever read on DU. Atman Jan 2012 #78

actually, the boxers are in a twist. but again, you are not aware of the issue, obviously. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #79

That's why I wear briefs, instead of boxers. MineralMan Jan 2012 #81

that is fuckin funny MM. lol seabeyond Jan 2012 #84

The boxers v. briefs controversy MineralMan Jan 2012 #87

White cotton briefs are for little boys and teenagers. RadiationTherapy Jan 2012 #104

Well, I don't wear white cotton briefs. MineralMan Jan 2012 #112

Well, I am a bit hyper-sensitive about the amount of arrested development I see among adults; RadiationTherapy Jan 2012 #138

I made an honest effort to stay out of this MrCoffee Jan 2012 #156

Thank you, thank you. RadiationTherapy Jan 2012 #157

And they're just ugly. redqueen Jan 2012 #161

I really don't pay much attention to what kind of underwear MineralMan Jan 2012 #162

lmfao.... ya, i HAD to go into the stores to buy undies for guys. i didnt notice all those pictures seabeyond Jan 2012 #163

Atman, rather than making assumptions with repsect to Camille Paglia writings/comparisons-- hlthe2b Jan 2012 #88

I would expect nothing more than thoughtless kneejerking from most people. redqueen Jan 2012 #101

I didn't see the thread linked. Atman Jan 2012 #103

I had no problem finding it in GD--this is, after all a copy cat thread--if you had really wanted to hlthe2b Jan 2012 #134

I'm sorry I'm not good enough for your sanctimonious ass. Atman Jan 2012 #170

I have not been incivil to you... It does speak volumes that you reply in this manner. hlthe2b Jan 2012 #171

If you don't think your response was uncivil, then therein lies the problem. Atman Jan 2012 #173

how many people have clued you in before your second post to rant about panties? how many people seabeyond Jan 2012 #176

Calling someone an ass is your definition of civility... Ummm ok. I think your derision of others hlthe2b Jan 2012 #177

Please. redqueen Jan 2012 #180

The same three of you, responding to every post. Atman Jan 2012 #184

I'm responding to every post? redqueen Jan 2012 #185

Masturbation is also a form of safe sex. William769 Jan 2012 #82

Plus it's pretty much guaranteed MineralMan Jan 2012 #86

your post is offensive, so yah, stop fucking around with us. Whisp Jan 2012 #93

Amen +1000 - Douglas Carpenter Jan 2012 #94

I think you tell more about yourself than you want to reveal Whisp Jan 2012 #107

I think they work very hard at not getting it. redqueen Jan 2012 #131

only jackoffs jack off! Suji to Seoul Jan 2012 #119

Not to mention the terms that go along with the practice.... jorno67 Jan 2012 #121

lofl uponit7771 Jan 2012 #149

I have no idea... sledwreck13 Jan 2012 #155

Every sperm is sacred KamaAina Jan 2012 #158

This is a cheap-shot thread DeathToTheOil Jan 2012 #166

I just want to say... redqueen Jan 2012 #181

You're doing it wrong! LOL. AtomicKitten Jan 2012 #175

Ha! whatchamacallit Jan 2012 #178

So this thread calls out the "Prostitution is Violence" thread Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2012 #186